Abstract:Despite the decades-long recognition of the importance of scaling in ecology, our knowledge about many ecological patterns and processes is still largely restricted to particular spatial and temporal scale domains with relatively narrow ranges. There is no exception when it comes to the study of biodiversity, one of the most important and active research fields in ecology. Increasing work suggests that such narrow ranges of scales are in most cases inadequate for addressing conservation challenges associated with biodiversity change. The need for understanding how biodiversity is shaped and will change across different scales is stronger than ever. Here, we review recent progresses of up-scaling and down-scaling biodiversity in the context of global environmental change, with focus on two relatively large spatial scale domains, i.e., the landscape and macroecological scales. Landscape ecology and macroecology are both active, but so-far poorly connected research fields. They share a common central motivation of unraveling spatial patterning of biodiversity and the underlying mechanisms. Our literature review suggests that landscape-scale processes may exert unexpected up-scaling effects to shape biodiversity patterns at macroecological scales, while macroecological processes may generate a range of down-scaling effects on landscape biodiversity. Specifically, although there is a lack of consensus on the underlying mechanisms, it is likely that landscape processes scale up through connectivity and feedback loops within and across landscapes to affect macroecological biodiversity responses. On the other hand, the down-scaling effects of macroecological processes on biodiversity is often confounded with small-scale processes, leading to various responses inconsistent with direct down-scaling extrapolations. In addition, the temporal dimension is indispensable to investigating effects and mechanisms of cross-scale processes. Specifically, long-term (decades and beyond) perspectives are necessary for re-evaluating ecological knowledge obtained from biodiversity responses to short-term environmental changes and recognizing historical legacies of both landscape and macroecological processes on biodiversity at the two spatial scales. Overall, scaling analyses of ecological processes across spatial extents ranging from small habitats to the globe have revealed biodiversity responses to anthropogenic environmental changes as inconsistent with assumptions and extrapolations based on extant ecological knowledge at a few fixed scales. Such analyses are needed to better inform conservation actions and planning practiced mainly at local to macroecological scales. We suggest that elucidating cross-scaling mechanisms and accumulating long-term time series at multiple spatial scales are key to linking landscape ecology and macroecology in terms of biodiversity dynamics. Such efforts would be an important contribution to the ecological basis for managing biodiversity change in the Anthropocene, as these dynamics involve multiple up-scaling and down-scaling processes over time.

Spatial scale and the synchrony of ecological disruption

Ecological synchrony in human-modified landscapes under a changing climate

The projected timing of abrupt ecological disruption from climate change

Spatial match–mismatch between predators and prey under climate change

Coarse climate change projections for species living in a fine‐scaled world

Spatial Scales of Population Synchrony generally increases as fluctuations propagate in a Two Species Ecosystem

Scaling approaches and macroecology provide a foundation for assessing ecological resilience in the Anthropocene

Biodiversity shows unique responses to land-use change across regional biomes

Tree rings reveal the transient risk of extinction hidden inside climate envelope forecasts

Proximal microclimate: Moving beyond spatiotemporal resolution improves ecological predictions

Solving the SLoSS debate: Scale-dependent effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity loss

Nonequilibrium dynamics in conservation biology: Scales, attractors and critical points

Disentangling the effects of climate change, landscape heterogeneity, and scale on phenological metrics

A global synthesis of animal phenological responses to climate change

Climate change threatens the future viability of translocated populations

Regional Biomes outperform broader spatial units in capturing biodiversity responses to land‐use change

Ecosystem synchrony: an emerging property to elucidate ecosystem responses to global change

Linking Landscape Ecology and Macroecology by Scaling Biodiversity in Space and Time

River flow intermittence influence biodiversity–stability relationships across spatial scales: Implications for an uncertain future

Ecological scales of effect vary across space and time

Insufficient and biased representation of species geographic responses to climate change