Abstract:Trait analysis is a major workhorse of modern community ecology. However, much of our knowledge of trait‐based community ecology remains spatially implicit. This study provides novel insights into spatial and scale‐dependent variability in functional community structure, environment and biodiversity and their relationships. The results demonstrate the usefulness of spatial trait analyses in identifying scale‐dependent assembly processes or finding the importance of processes to biodiversity distributions in heterogeneous landscapes. The spatially explicit perspective provided here would be helpful for the progress of trait ecology. Ecological processes such as environmental filtering and biotic interactions that shape species' traits and community diversity often vary with geographic distance, potentially generating spatial structures in trait variation, covariation and biodiversity data. Understanding spatial structures of trait, environment and biodiversity, or the spatial link between those factors, is fundamental to identifying spatially explicit assembly processes or biodiversity distributions in spatially heterogeneous landscapes but remains unclear. To address the issue, we gathered individual‐level leaf and diameter traits data paired with environmental data from a 4.8 ha subtropical Chinese forest and divided the forest into 25, 100, 400 and 1936 m2 grids representing contrasting spatial grains. Using Moran's correlograms, we quantified the spatial structures of trait variation and covariation, environmental conditions and biodiversity. We assessed the links between those variables using path analyses. Most variables were spatially positively autocorrelated. However, trait mean was more autocorrelated than trait variation or covariation, and intraspecific trait variation was more autocorrelated than interspecific variation. Autocorrelations in those community properties were generally weak at the large grain. Path analyses indicated positive associations between interspecific trait variation and species diversity at a very small to medium scale and a positive association between intraspecific variation and small‐scale functional diversity. Trait covariation constrained biodiversity, and multi‐trait means were negatively linked to very small‐ to medium‐scale species diversity but positively to medium‐ and large‐scale functional diversity. Patterns regarding multi‐trait community structure–environment–biodiversity associations were generally held for individual traits. However, depending on the trait, spatial scale and plant ontogenic stage, the pattern's strength changed, or occasionally, their sign reversed. We attribute spatial patterns in multi‐trait mean and covariation to scale‐dependent variation in environmental heterogeneity and trait variation to scale‐dependent competition. Synthesis. Our study provides novel insights into spatial and scale‐dependent variability in functional community structure, environment and biodiversity, and their relationships. Our results demonstrate the usefulness of spatial trait analyses in identifying scale‐dependent assembly processes or finding the importance of processes to biodiversity distributions in spatially heterogeneous landscapes. A spatially explicit perspective is thus helpful for the progress of trait ecology.

Ecological scales of effect vary across space and time

What determines the spatial extent of landscape effects on species?

Relationship between bird abundances and landscape characteristics: the influence of scale

Functional Traits and Environment Jointly Determine the Spatial Scaling of Population Stability in North American Birds

Spatial and Temporal Scales of Landscape Structure Affect the Biodiversity-Landscape Relationship Across Ecologically Distinct Species Groups

The scale of effect of landscape context varies with the species’ response variable measured

Habitat configuration influences mammal populations at a wider spatial extent than habitat composition: a meta-analysis of forest mammal datasets

Long‐term effects of land‐use change on bird communities depend on spatial scale and land‐use type

Space‐for‐time substitutions exaggerate urban bird–habitat ecological relationships

Putting space into trait ecology: Trait, environment and biodiversity relationships at multiple spatial scales

Occupancy-abundance Relationships and Sampling Scales

Linking intrinsic scales of ecological processes to characteristic scales of biodiversity and functioning patterns

Effects of Sampling Scales on Spatial Patterns of Woody Species in Forests

Spatial effects on species persistence and implications for biodiversity

Scale effects on the pattern and predictors of small mammal diversity along a local elevational gradient in the Great Basin

Spatial Scales of Population Synchrony generally increases as fluctuations propagate in a Two Species Ecosystem

Spatio‐temporal integrated Bayesian species distribution models reveal lack of broad relationships between traits and range shifts

Scale-dependent effects of urbanization on avian diversity in a Neotropical region

The ecological significance of extremely large flocks of birds

Avian responses to extreme weather across functional traits and temporal scales

Scaling in the growth of geographically subdivided populations: invariant patterns from a continent-wide biological survey