Abstract:PurposeHypofractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancer is gaining clinical acceptance given its potential increase in therapeutic ratio and evidence for noninferiority and lack of added late toxicities compared to conventional fractionation. However, concerns have been raised that smaller number of fractions might lead to larger dosimetric influence by interfractional motion. We aim to compare the effect of these variations on hypofractionated pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for localized prostate cancer.MethodsWeekly CT images were acquired for 6 patients participating in a randomized clinical trial. PBS plans featuring bilateral (BL) and a combination of lateral and anterior-oblique beams (AOL), and VMAT plans were created. All patients were treated to a conventional 79.2Gy total dose in 44 fractions. For this study, hypofractionated dose to the prostate gland was 51.6Gy in 12 fractions or 36.25Gy in 5 fractions, and 32.8, and 23.1Gy to proximal seminal vesicles, respectively. Patients were simulated with endorectal balloons to aid gland immobilization. Three fiducial markers were implanted for setup guidance. All plans were recomputed on the weekly CT images after aligning with the simulation CT. The entire set of 9 CT images was used for dose recalculation for 12-fraction and only 5 used for the 5-fraction case. Adaptive range adjustments were applied to anterior-oblique beams assuming clinical availability of invivo range verification. Fractional doses were summed using deformable dose accumulation to approximate the delivered dose. Biologically equivalent dose to 2Gy(EQD2) was calculated assuming / of 1.5Gy for prostate and 3Gy for bladder and rectum.ResultsThe median delivered prostate D-98 was 0.13/0.14/0.13Gy(EQD2) smaller than planned for PBS-BL, 0.13/0.27/0.17Gy(EQD2) for PBS-AOL and 0.59/0.66/0.59Gy(EQD2) for VMAT, for 44/12/5 fractions, respectively. The largest D-98 reduction was 1.5 and 3.5Gy(EQD2) for CTV1 and CTV2, respectively. Target dose degradation was comparable for all fractionation schemes within each modality. The maximum increase in rectum D-2 was 0.98Gy(EQD2) for a 5-fraction PBS case.ConclusionsThe robustness of PBS and VMAT were comparable for all patients for the studied fractionations. The delivered target dose generally remained within clinical tolerance and the deviations were relatively minor for both fractionation schemes. The delivered OAR dose stayed in compliance with the RTOG hypofractionation constraints for all cases.

Single isocenter versus dual isocenter treatment using flattening filter‐free and jaw‐tracking volumetrically modulated arc therapy for boot‐shaped lung cancer: Evaluation of dosimetric and feasibility

A dosimetric comparison of the tangential beams IMRT with multifield beams IMRT of the chest wall in postmastectomy breast cancer recurrent patients

Impact Of Interfractional Motion On Hypofractionated Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy And Vmat Delivery For Prostate Cancer

Dosimetric comparison of commonly used volumetric modulated arc therapy field arrangements based on flattening filter-free beams for synchronous bilateral breast carcinoma radiotherapy

Comparison of the Effects of Two Types of Multileaf Collimators on Tumor Control Probability in Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer after Conservative Surgery Based on the EUD Model ⁎

Planning Analysis for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer: Dosimetric and Efficiency Comparisons Between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (imrt), Single-Arc/Partial-Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (Sa/pa-Vmat)

Sparing Organs at Risk with Simultaneous Integrated Boost Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: an Automatic Treatment Planning Study

Early-stage central lung cancer and volumetric modulated arc therapy: a dosimetric case study with literature review

Dosimetric Comparison Between IMRT and VMAT in Irradiation for Peripheral and Central Lung Cancer.

Clinical Feasibility of Using Single-isocentre Non-coplanar Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Combined with Non-coplanar Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Five or Fewer Multiple Intracranial Metastases

The Therapeutic Value of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy In Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Primary Tumors: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis Based On Propensity Score Matching And Comparison With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

Comprehensive dosimetric planning comparison for early-stage, non-small cell lung cancer with SABR: fixed-beam IMRT versus VMAT versus TomoTherapy

Treating early-stage centrally-located non-small cell lung cancer with DCAT-SBRT in centers lacking the VMAT technique: a comprehensive study

Retrospective Quality Metrics Review of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Plans Treating Multiple Targets Using Single-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

Dosimetric Comparison for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy on the Left-Sided Chest Wall and Internal Mammary Nodes Irradiation in Treating Post-Mastectomy Breast Cancer

SU-E-T-389: Evaluation of Flattening-Filter-Free Arcs for Lung SBRT

A Comparative Study of Identical VMAT Plans with and Without Jaw Tracking Technique.

Evaluation of Flattening-Filter-free and Flattening Filter Dosimetric and Radiobiological Criteria for Lung SBRT: A Volume-Based Analysis

Radiobiological analysis of VMAT treatment plan with flattened and flattening filter free photon beam: an EUD and TCP based comparative study

EP-1567: A Hybrid IMRT/VMAT Technique for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy as an alternative to intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary tumors of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective analysis based on propensity score matching br