Abstract:s The report describes the main features of the Chernobyl reactor and possible reasons of the accident that happened on 26 April 1986. Analysis of scientific results established after the accident demonstrates that shortcomings in the design, and freak infringements of safety regulations for the construction as well as inadequate documentation for reactor operation were the main reason of the Chernobyl accident. Various scenarios proposed for this accident are also analyzed in the report. It is concluded that a very high probability of the nuclear explosions at the reactor of the Unit 4 of the Chernobyl accident exists. The power of it could be equivalent to 200 tons of the trinitrotoluene (TNT). Introduction The accident at Unit 4 of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) on 26 April 1986 is the most severe accident in the history of the peaceful use of the nuclear energy. As a result of this accident the reactor of the fourth unit of the Chernobyl accident was fully destroyed. This caused a release of a very high amount of radioactive species into the environment. The total activity of all radionuclides that escaped from the active core of the reactor during 10 days after the explosions is assessed as approximately 10 Bq [1]. The reasons for the Chernobyl accident and its consequences were the subject of the Post-Accident Review Meeting held on 25-29 August 1986 in Vienna, Austria [2]. It was organized under the auspices of the IAEA. The Soviet experts reported at the meeting their version of the reasons of the accident as well as its possible consequences [3]. The accident occurred during a turbogenerator test carried out at the chance of the shutdown of the unit for a planned maintenance. The destruction of the reactor happened 6-7 seconds after the operator pressed the scram button, AZ-5 to insert all control rods into the core. According to the Soviet experts the prime cause of the accident at the Chernobyl NPP was “...an extremely improbable combination of violations of instructions and operating rules committed by the staff of the unit” [3]. This conclusion sets a full responsibility for the accident at the Chernobyl NPP on its stuff. Participants of the Post-Accident Review Meeting [2] also accepted the Soviet version. However, it was incorrect. This was demonstrated in 1990 by the commission of the State Committee for Atomic Safety Survey of the USSR which concluded that the main reasons of the Chernobyl accident were serious shortcomings in the design of the Chernobyl reactor as well as inadequate documents regulating a safe operation of the reactor [4]. Various errors, that were made during the turbogenerator testing by the personnel of the fours unit of the Chernobyl NPP, according to the commission, could only contribute to the development of the accident. This commission will be named in the present report as the Sternberg commission after the name of its chairman. The conclusions of the Sternberg commission were accepted later by the International Consultative Group on the Nuclear Safety that issued in 1993 a Supplement to INSAG-1 [5]. In this report of the International Consultative Group on the Nuclear Safety, the main accent was laid also on various shortcomings of the RBMK design. At the same time the International Consultative Group on the Nuclear Safety indicated that the important reason of the Chernobyl accident was an inadequate “nuclear safety

Time-Independent Neutronic Analysis of the Chernobyl Accident

Reactivity calculations of the Chernobyl accident

A simplified analysis of the Chernobyl accident

Analysis of Reactivity Coefficients of Chernobyl Reactor by Cell Calculation

Sensitivity of the neutron multiplication factor to water ingress into a spent fuel cask

Assessment of Contributions by Void Reactivity Coefficient and End Effect of Control Rods into ChNPP-4 Accident Progression

Calculation analysis of a severe accident at a nuclear power plant with a sodium-cooled fast reactor

Time-dependent variation of the neutron multiplication factor in spent fuel storage

Analysis of Reactivity Induced Accident for Control Rods Ejection with Loss of Cooling

Numerical Monte Carlo analysis of the void coefficient in Pavia TRIGA Mark II reactor

Computational Analysis of the Possible Location of Ionization Chambers in Fast Reactors

Determination of neutron flux redistribution factors for a typical pressurized water reactor ex-core measurements using Monte Carlo technique

Steady-state analysis of the 1970 Windscale nuclear criticality incident

ACTIVATION AND 3-DEMENSIONAL DOSE ANALYSIS SURROUNDING THE CONTROL RODS OF THE HTR-PM REACTOR WITH MONTE CARLO METHOD

Reactors as a source of antineutrinos: the effect of fuel loading and burnup for mixed oxide fuels

Observations on the Chernobyl Disaster and LNT

Possible criticality scenario and its mechanism of the Windscale Works criticality accident in 1970 analyzed by computational fluid dynamics and Monte Carlo neutron transport

Defining the performance envelope of reactivity-initiated accidents in a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor

Simulation of the Measured Reactivity Distributions in the Subcritical MYRRHA Reactor

Uncertainty quantification of criticality in light-water-moderated and graphite-reflected core with highly enriched uranium fuel at university teaching and research reactor

The Chernobyl Reactor : Design Features and Reasons for Accident