What is the plausibility that all drugs will be designed by computers by the end of the decade?

José L. Medina-Franco,Edgar López-López,José L. Medina-FrancoEdgar López-Lópeza DIFACQUIM Research Group,Department of Pharmacy,School of Chemistry,Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,Mexico,Mexicob Department of Chemistry and Graduate Program in Pharmacology,Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute,Mexico,Mexico
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2024.2331734
2024-03-20
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
Abstract:KEYWORDS: Drug design and development (DDD) is a lengthy and time-consuming process. The process can take up to 14–15 years, and the cost ranges from US 2,826 million (2019 estimate), and these costs keep rising [ Citation 1 ]. For several decades, computers have played a key role in DDD. The application of an extensive group of computational or in silico tools are referred to as computer-aided drug design (CADD), which have been used in academia and industry for several years [ Citation 2 ]. CADD is an interdisciplinary field and has become one of the pillars in the pharmaceutical discovery pipelines. Current significant technological advances that are transforming CADD into computationally-driven drug discovery (CDDD) include but are not limited to [ Citation 3 ]: large (10 6 –10 7 ) compound libraries in stock; ultra-large (10 10 –10 15 ) on-demand, and generative virtual libraries (10 23 –10 60 ); advances in structure-based and artificial intelligence (AI)-based virtual screening of the large and ultra-large spaces; de novo design; free energy perturbation and AI-based QSAR/QSPR modeling to enhance potency and selectivity; data-driven computational tools to predict absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and bioactivity, and toxicology. The latter predictions are now routinely used in multiparameter hit-to-lead optimization. However, any computational model – regardless of its accuracy and applicability – will never ensure that all the predictions are correct. Strictly speaking, exact prediction of an experimental value is not possible as any experimental determination also has a degree of uncertainty. Computational predictions require experimental validation with appropriate and robust in vitro and in vivo assays. In turn, the experimental data can be fed back into the models to improve the quality [ Citation 3 , Citation 4 ]. In addition, as discussed in Section 2, AI plays a key role in synthesis planning and computational approaches that are used in the wet lab as part of the DDD automatization process.
pharmacology & pharmacy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?