Abstract:Background and aims: Osteoarthritis is the major cause of disability worldwide that causes significant problems in activities of daily living and deeply affects the quality of life. Osteoarthritis is predicted to become one of the major causes of disability in future that necessitates comprehensive global plans for resolving this health issue in accordance with patients' local culture, beliefs and attitudes. This study was a part of PhD dissertation that was conducted to carry out an in-depth examination of the experiences of patients with OA about their use of strategies for the OA self-management and compare them with scientific evidences. Methods: The present qualitative study was conducted using a conventional content analysis approach on 33participantincluding patients with OA, their family members and healthcare personnel who were selected by purposive sampling. Data were collected through unstructured and semi-structured interviews and continued until data saturation occurred. Data analysis was carried out simultaneously. Guba and Lincoln's standards of rigor and trustworthiness were respected including the credibility, transferability, dependability and conformability of the data. A narrative systematic review was conducted on osteoarthritis care guidelines and algorithms in order to compare patients' preference with scientific evidences. Results: The analysis of the data revealed four main categories, including: Conservative approach in selecting treatment modalities, trend toward traditional treatment, Preferring complementary and alternative medicine, and concerns and barriers treatment modalities. The review of literature demonstrated little attention by professionals to the patients' values or priorities. Comparing of the modalities that were preferred by patients with scientific guidelines indicated some inconsistencies. Conclusion: Patient's perceptions, preference, and adherence to treatment, play an essential role in relieving nagging symptoms and treatments outcomes. Although guidelines are used to define best practices in osteoarthritis care, patient preference that derived from their local culture, beliefs and attitudes should be considered to operationalization. Participating the patients on the therapeutic goal setting as well as clinical decision-making, and supervising the use of complementary treatments are recommended. Patients should be involved in the development of clinical practice guidelines.

Healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences of osteoporosis medication treatment: a qualitative systematic review

Perspectives of healthcare providers on osteoporosis, falls and fracture risk: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

Perceptions and practices of aged care pharmacists regarding osteoporosis management: a qualitative study

Supporting patients to get the best from their osteoporosis treatment: a rapid realist review of what works, for whom, and in what circumstance

Experiences of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a narrative review

Non-pharmacological management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: health-care professional perspectives and experiences

Stated Preferences of At-Risk Populations for the Treatment of Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review

Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Strategies in Osteoporosis: A Comprehensive Review

Secondary fracture prevention in primary care: a narrative review

Healthcare professionals' perceptions and experiences of obesity and overweight and its management in primary care settings: a qualitative systematic review

Osteoporosis management-current and future perspectives - A systemic review

The evaluation of an osteoporosis medication management service in community pharmacy, a cohort study

Pathophysiology and treatment of osteoporosis: challenges for clinical practice in older people

A person-centred primary care pharmacist-led osteoporosis review for optimising medicines (PHORM): a protocol for the development and co-design of a model consultation intervention

Examining treatment targets and equity in bone-active medication use within secondary fracture prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Osteoporosis management in Australian aged care facilities: a mixed method study

Osteoporosis: a discussion on the past 5 years

Patients' experiences with musculoskeletal spinal pain: A qualitative systematic review protocol

Beyond the Surface: Uncovering Secondary Causes of Osteoporosis for Optimal Management

26 Audit of osteoporosis treatment in patients undergoing Orthogeriatric rehabilitation

161: BRIDGING BETWEEN PATIENTS PREFERENCE AND EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE ACCORDING TO GUIDELINES IN OSTEOARTHRITIS MANAGEMENT: A QUALITATIVE STUDY