Contrasting plant transcriptome responses between a pierce-sucking and a chewing herbivore go beyond the infestation site

Álvaro Montesinos,Soledad Sacristán,Palmira Del Prado-Polonio,Ana Arnaiz,Sandra Díaz-González,Isabel Diaz,M Estrella Santamaria,Palmira del Prado-Polonio,M. Estrella Santamaria

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04806-1

IF: 5.26

2024-02-21

BMC Plant Biology

Abstract:Plants have acquired a repertoire of mechanisms to combat biotic stressors, which may vary depending on the feeding strategies of herbivores and the plant species. Hormonal regulation crucially modulates this malleable defense response. Jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) stand out as pivotal regulators of defense, while other hormones like abscisic acid (ABA), ethylene (ET), gibberellic acid (GA) or auxin also play a role in modulating plant-pest interactions. The plant defense response has been described to elicit effects in distal tissues, whereby aboveground herbivory can influence belowground response, and vice versa. This impact on distal tissues may be contingent upon the feeding guild, even affecting both the recovery of infested tissues and those that have not suffered active infestation.

plant sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to explore how herbivorous insects with different feeding strategies trigger different plant defense responses in the affected and distal tissues during and after plant infestation. Specifically, the researchers selected Arabidopsis thaliana L. as the experimental object and carried out infestation experiments with the chewing pest Pieris brassicae L. and the piercing - sucking pest Tetranychus urticae Koch respectively to observe the effects of these two pests on the plant transcriptome under moderate infestation conditions.

The study found that although the overall affected processes caused by the two pests were similar, there were significant differences in the degree of their effects. For example, plants infested by Pieris brassicae L. showed short - term responses, mainly involving stress - related genes, jasmonic acid (JA) and abscisic acid (ABA) regulation, and growth - inhibiting - related genes; while Tetranychus urticae Koch triggered a longer - term transcriptome response in plants, although the degree of differential expression was lower, especially affecting the regulation of salicylic acid (SA). These different defense responses are not limited to the infested parts, but also spread through the roots, leading to changes in hormone responses, flavonoid regulation or cell wall reorganization, etc.

In conclusion, this study reveals that there are differences in plant transcriptome responses triggered by pests with different feeding strategies, and this response can go beyond the infested parts and affect tissues not directly infested. This emphasizes the need to comprehensively consider the response of the whole plant when considering local biotic stress.