Abstract:Two types of disruptive effects of irrelevant sound on visual tasks have been reported: the changing-state effect and the deviation effect. The idea that the deviation effect, which arises from attentional capture, is independent of task requirements, whereas the changing-state effect is specific to tasks that require serial processing, has been examined by comparing tasks that do or do not require serial-order processing. While many previous studies used the missing-item task as the nonserial task, it is unclear whether other cognitive tasks lead to similar results regarding the different task specificity of both effects. Kattner et al . ( Memory and Cognition , 2023) used the mental-arithmetic task as the nonserial task, and failed to demonstrate the deviation effect. However, there were several procedural factors that could account for the lack of deviation effect, such as differences in design and procedures (e.g., conducted online, intermixed conditions). In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether the deviation effect could be observed in both the serial-recall and mental-arithmetic tasks when these procedural factors were modified. We found strong evidence of the deviation effect in both the serial-recall and the mental-arithmetic tasks when stimulus presentation and experimental design were aligned with previous studies that demonstrated the deviation effect (e.g., conducted in-person, blockwise presentation of sound, etc.). The results support the idea that the deviation effect is not task-specific. Two types of disruptive effects of irrelevant sound on visual tasks have been reported: the changing-state effect and the deviation effect. The idea that the deviation effect, which arises from attentional capture, is independent of task requirements, whereas the changing-state effect is specific to tasks that require serial processing, has been examined by comparing tasks that do or do not require serial-order processing. While many previous studies used the missing-item task as the nonserial task, it is unclear whether other cognitive tasks lead to similar results regarding the different task specificity of both effects. Kattner et al . ( Memory and Cognition , 2023) used the mental-arithmetic task as the nonserial task, and failed to demonstrate the deviation effect. However, there were several procedural factors that could account for the lack of deviation effect, such as differences in design and procedures (e.g., conducted online, intermixed conditions). In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether the deviation effect could be observed in both the serial-recall and mental-arithmetic tasks when these procedural factors were modified. We found strong evidence of the deviation effect in both the serial-recall and the mental-arithmetic tasks when stimulus presentation and experimental design were aligned with previous studies that demonstrated the deviation effect (e.g., conducted in-person, blockwise presentation of sound, etc.). The results support the idea that the deviation effect is not task-specific.

Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: The role of segmentation

False memories through auditory distraction: When irrelevant speech produces memory intrusions in the absence of semantic interference

Dissociating Two Forms of Auditory Distraction in a Novel Stroop Serial Recall Experiment

Replicating and extending hemispheric asymmetries in auditory distraction: no metacognitive awareness for the left-ear disadvantage for changing-state sounds

Attention is Required for Knowledge-Based Sequential Grouping: Insights from the Integration of Syllables into Words.

Short- and long-term influences of repeated speech examples on segmentation in an unfamiliar language analog

Not fully remembered, but not forgotten: interfering sounds worsen but do not eliminate the representation of pitch in working memory

When is forewarned forearmed? Predicting auditory distraction in short-term memory.

Attentional control and metacognitive monitoring of the effects of different types of task-irrelevant sound on serial recall.

Slipping through the cracks: The peril of unexpected interruption on the contents of working memory.

Auditory context-dependent distraction by unexpected visual stimuli

The effect of processing load on loss of information from short-term memory

Splitting time: Sound-induced illusory visual temporal fission and fusion.

Distraction by Auditory Categorical Deviations Is Unrelated to Working Memory Capacity: Further Evidence of a Distinction between Acoustic and Categorical Deviation Effects

Auditory distraction during reading: Investigating the effects of background sounds on parafoveal processing

The contribution of disengagement to temporal discriminability

Delayed Stream Segregation in Older Adults: More Than Just Informational Masking.

Perception of Temporally Interleaved Ambiguous Patterns

Delayed Stream Segregation in Older Adults

Revisiting the Deviation Effects of Irrelevant Sound on Serial and Nonserial Tasks

Effect of spectral smearing on the perceptual segregation of vowel sequences