Stacking and voting ensemble methods fusion to evaluate instructor performance in higher education

Ravinder Ahuja,S. C. Sharma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-021-00729-4
2021-07-19
International Journal of Information Technology
Abstract:Machine learning has emerged as the most widely used tool in resolving administrative and other educational-related problems like student dropout. Most of the research in the educational field centers on demonstrating the student’s potential rather than focusing on faculty quality. This paper proposed a model, which is the fusion of stacking and voting ensemble, to evaluate faculty performance. We have considered two datasets; one is taken from the UCI machine learning repository (Teaching Assistant Evaluation) and another is collected from the students of a university. We have applied fifteen classification algorithms- K Nearest neighbors, Extra Tree, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, CatBoost Classifier, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Random Forest Classifier, Decision Tree Classifier, Ridge Classifier, Gradient Boosting Classifier, Logistic Regression, Ada Boost Classifier, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, SVM—Linear Kernel, Naive Bayes, and proposed model using the python programming language. It is observed that the proposed model is giving 2% higher accuracy than results present in the literature on the teaching assistant evaluation dataset. The variable importance is also computed on the collected feedback, which gives the factors playing important roles in faculty performance. The analysis shows that the ability of faculty to link contents with real-life examples, faculty encouraged student's participation in class discussion, and faculty ability to inspire students to learn the course plays important roles in the performance of faculty.
English Else
What problem does this paper attempt to address?