Steps towards "Quantum Gravity" and the practice of science: will the merger of mathematics and physics work?

Bernhelm Booss-Bavnbek
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11897-5_7
2009-11-24
Abstract:The author recalls general tendencies of the "mathematization" of the sciences and derives challenges and tentative obstructions for a successful merger of mathematics and physics on fancied steps towards "Quantum Gravity". This is an edited version of the author's opening words to an international workshop "Quantum Gravity: An Assessment", Denmark, May 17-18, 2008. It followed immediately after the Quantum Gravity Summer School 2008, see <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://QuantumGravity.ruc.dk/" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>
Mathematical Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the possibility of integrating mathematics and physics and the challenges it faces. The author first reviews the trend of mathematization in science and raises several key issues and propositions: 1. **Natural Laboratory**: The natural laboratory for quantum gravity is the universe itself, but we cannot control it. 2. **Long-term Verification**: The verification of important theories may take a long time, possibly requiring the next generation of scientists to confirm or refute them. For example, the Casimir effect took 49 years to be verified, while Hawking radiation or string theory is even more difficult to verify. 3. **The Necessity of Unifying Gravity with Other Interaction Forces**: Some physicists believe it is unnecessary to unify gravity with other interaction forces, but without doing so, gravitational physics may gradually lose its significance. 4. **Innovative Work**: Much of the innovative work in the field of quantum gravity lies at the edge between abstract mathematics and novel physical concepts, bringing both new opportunities and challenges. Next, the author reviews the historical application of mathematics in various disciplines and discusses the issues of theoretical relevance and mathematical clarity brought about by the blurred boundaries between mathematics and physics. Finally, the paper mentions some current problems faced by physics, such as the controversy over string theory and the stagnation of theoretical development, and proposes a method of distinguishing between theory, model, and experiment to better understand the role of mathematics in scientific research.