Abstract:The past three decades have witnessed notable success in designing efficient SAT solvers, with modern solvers capable of solving industrial benchmarks containing millions of variables in just a few seconds. The success of modern SAT solvers owes to the widely-used CDCL algorithm, which lacks comprehensive theoretical investigation. Furthermore, it has been observed that CDCL solvers still struggle to deal with specific classes of benchmarks comprising only hundreds of variables, which contrasts with their widespread use in real-world applications. Consequently, there is an urgent need to uncover the inner workings of these seemingly weak yet powerful black boxes. In this paper, we present a first step towards this goal by introducing an approach called CausalSAT, which employs causal reasoning to gain insights into the functioning of modern SAT solvers. CausalSAT initially generates observational data from the execution of SAT solvers and learns a structured graph representing the causal relationships between the components of a SAT solver. Subsequently, given a query such as whether a clause with low literals blocks distance (LBD) has a higher clause utility, CausalSAT calculates the causal effect of LBD on clause utility and provides an answer to the question. We use CausalSAT to quantitatively verify hypotheses previously regarded as "rules of thumb" or empirical findings such as the query above. Moreover, CausalSAT can address previously unexplored questions, like which branching heuristic leads to greater clause utility in order to study the relationship between branching and clause management. Experimental evaluations using practical benchmarks demonstrate that CausalSAT effectively fits the data, verifies four "rules of thumb", and provides answers to three questions closely related to implementing modern solvers.

Integrating Conflict Driven Clause Learning to Local Search

On the Effect of Learned Clauses on Stochastic Local Search

Clause States Based Configuration Checking in Local Search for Satisfiability

A Deep Dive into Conflict Generating Decisions

Boosting branch-and-bound MaxSAT solvers with clause learning

Between SAT and UNSAT: The Fundamental Difference in CDCL SAT

Improving Local Search for Structured SAT Formulas Via Unit Propagation Based Construct and Cut Initialization (short Paper)

A Randomized Diversification Strategy for Solving Satisfiability Problem with Long Clauses.

Learn to relax: Integrating 0-1 integer linear programming with pseudo-Boolean conflict-driven search

Phase transition for Local Search on planted SAT

clauseSMT: A NLSAT-Based Clause-Level Framework for Satisfiability Modulo Nonlinear Real Arithmetic Theory

Evolving difficult SAT instances thanks to local search

PbO-CCSAT: Boosting Local Search for Satisfiability Using Programming by Optimisation

Too much information: Why CDCL solvers need to forget learned clauses.

AutoSAT: Automatically Optimize SAT Solvers via Large Language Models

Combining Clause Learning and Branch and Bound for MaxSAT (extended Abstract).

NLocalSAT: Boosting Local Search with Solution Prediction

Enhance SAT Conflict Analysis for Model Checking

Explaining SAT Solving Using Causal Reasoning

Integrating SAT solvers with domain-specific reasoners

Local Consistency and SAT-Solvers