Cross-cultural Differences in Using Nonverbal Behaviors to Identify Indirect Replies

Hio Tong Pang,Xiaolin Zhou,Mingyuan Chu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-024-00454-z

2024-02-08

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

Abstract:The ability to decode nonverbal cues is essential for effective cross-cultural communication. Despite the significance of nonverbal communication, research in this area has primarily focused on spoken language. This is particularly problematic during indirect communication, where there is a discrepancy between the surface meaning and the true intention (e.g., "Well, there is still room for improvement in your writing skills"). Misinterpretation of nonverbal cues during indirect communication can impede the decoding of true intention and potentially create hostile situations. The present study investigated cross-cultural differences in the use of nonverbal cues in decoding indirect messages. British and Chinese raters watched silent video clips and identified the types of replies from models of their own and the other culture. Results revealed that British raters were able to recognize indirect replies from British models but not from Chinese models above chance level, whereas Chinese raters were able to recognize indirect replies from models of both cultures above chance level. Furthermore, British raters showed higher accuracy and confidence in identifying indirect replies from British models than Chinese models. In contrast, Chinese raters were equally skilled and confident in identifying indirect replies from both British and Chinese models. Additionally, British and Chinese raters employed different nonverbal cues to recognize indirect replies from models of their respective cultures. These findings underscore the importance of cross-cultural differences in identifying indirect replies through nonverbal communication and provide insights to enhance intercultural communication between British and Chinese individuals.

psychology, social

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is the differences in recognizing indirect responses through nonverbal behaviors in a cross-cultural context. Specifically, the researchers aim to investigate whether British and Chinese individuals can accurately identify indirect responses through nonverbal cues (such as gestures, head tilts, facial expressions, and eye contact) when watching silent video clips, and whether there is an in-group advantage effect (i.e., whether individuals are better at recognizing nonverbal cues from their own cultural background). Additionally, the study explores the specific nonverbal cues that individuals from different cultural backgrounds rely on when recognizing indirect responses.

### Main Research Objectives:
1. **Ability to Recognize Indirect Responses**: To investigate whether British and Chinese raters can accurately recognize indirect responses from nonverbal cues, and whether their accuracy is significantly higher than random chance.
2. **In-Group Advantage Effect**: To examine whether British and Chinese raters exhibit an in-group advantage effect when recognizing indirect responses from models of the same culture versus different cultures, i.e., whether they perform better when recognizing models from their own cultural background.
3. **Cross-Cultural Differences**: To explore whether there are differences in the nonverbal cues used by British and Chinese raters when recognizing indirect responses.

### Research Background:
- **Importance of Nonverbal Communication**: Effective cross-cultural communication relies not only on language but also on the correct interpretation of nonverbal cues. In indirect communication, there is a discrepancy between the surface meaning and the true intention, and misreading nonverbal cues can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts.
- **Cultural Differences**: People from different cultural backgrounds exhibit significant differences in the use and interpretation of nonverbal cues. For example, Western cultures emphasize individual autonomy and self-expression, with richer nonverbal behaviors; whereas Eastern cultures emphasize collective harmony and social stability, with relatively fewer and more restricted nonverbal behaviors.

### Experimental Design:
- **Participants**: 82 Chinese raters and 80 British raters.
- **Materials**: 640 silent video clips, featuring responses from 32 Chinese models and 38 British models.
- **Method**: Raters watched the video clips and judged the type of response (direct, indirect, lie, or neutral), and reported their confidence levels.

### Results:
- **Accuracy Analysis**: British raters were able to accurately recognize indirect responses from British models but not from Chinese models. Conversely, Chinese raters were able to accurately recognize indirect responses from models of both cultural backgrounds.
- **In-Group Advantage Effect**: British raters performed better in recognizing indirect responses from British models, while Chinese raters performed equally well in recognizing models from both cultural backgrounds.
- **Confidence Analysis**: British raters exhibited higher confidence when recognizing indirect responses from British models, while Chinese raters showed equal confidence in recognizing models from both cultural backgrounds.

### Conclusion:
This study reveals the importance and differences of nonverbal behaviors in recognizing indirect responses in a cross-cultural context, providing valuable insights for improving cross-cultural communication between people from the UK and China.