Abstract:I aim to clarify the physical content and significance of naturalness. Physicists' earliest understanding of naturalness, as an autonomy of scales (AoS) requirement provides the most cogent definition of naturalness and I will assert that i) this provides a uniform notion which undergirds a myriad prominent naturalness conditions, ii) this is a reasonable criterion to impose on EFTs and iii) the successes and violations of naturalness are best understood when adhering to this notion of naturalness. I argue that this principle is neither an aesthetic nor a sociologically-influenced principle. I contend that naturalness may only be plausibly argued to be an aesthetic/sociological principle when formal measures of naturalness and their use in physics communities are conflated with the central dogma of naturalness - the former may indeed be argued to be sociologically-influenced and somewhat arbitrary - but these formal measures of naturalness are in fact less successful than AoS naturalness. I put forward arguments as to why AoS naturalness is well-defined and why it was reasonable for physicists to endorse this naturalness principle on both theoretical and empirical grounds. Up to date, no compelling reasons have appeared as to why the laws of nature should generically decoupling into quasi-autonomous physical domains. A decoupling of scales in the quantum realm is often claimed to be entailed by the Decoupling Theorem (Cao and Schweber (1993)), yet I will show that this theorem is too weak to underwrite quasi-autonomous physical domains in quantum field theories because one should additionally impose that parameters be natural. Violations of naturalness would then have ontological import - unnatural parameters would not be accurately described by EFTs but rather by field theories exhibiting some kind of UV/IR interplay.

Which fine-tuning arguments are fine?

A Natural Introduction to Fine-Tuning

Contextuality, Fine-Tuning, and Teleological Explanation

Naturalness, Extra-Empirical Theory Assessments, and the Implications of Skepticism

Natural Philosophy versus Philosophy of Naturalness

Precise interpretations of traditional fine-tuning measures

Naturalness as a reasonable scientific principle in fundamental physics

The Fine-Tuning Argument

A Definition for Fine Tuning in Analogy to the Chaos

CMSSM, naturalness and the "fine-tuning price" of the Very Large Hadron Collider

Deriving Ontological Statements from the Unnatural Higgs Mass

Is it possible to know cosmological fine-tuning?

On practical naturalness and its implications for weak scale supersymmetry

Broadband laser cooling of trapped atoms with ultrafast pulses

Computational and Biological Analogies for Understanding Fine-Tuned Parameters in Physics

Evaluation and Utility of Wilsonian Naturalness

Towards a No-Lose Theorem for Naturalness

Are Retrocausal Accounts of Entanglement Unnaturally Fine-Tuned?

Enforcing Semantic Integrity on Untrusted Clients in Networked Virtual Environments

A refinement of the argument of local realism versus quantum mechanics by algorithmic randomness

Higgs criticality in and beyond the Standard Model