Miscible transfer of solute in different types of rough fractures: from random to multiscale fracture walls heights

Harold Auradou,Alejandro Boschan,Ricardo Chertcoff,Maria Veronica D'Angelo,Jean-Pierre Hulin,Irene Ippolito
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2009.03.003
2009-02-05
Abstract:Miscible tracer dispersion measurements in transparent model fractures with different types of wall roughness are reported. The nature (Fickian or not) of dispersion is determined by studying variations of the mixing front as a function of the traveled distance but also as a function of the lateral scale over which the tracer concentration is averaged. The dominant convective dispersion mechanisms (velocity profile in the gap, velocity variations in the fracture plane) are established by comparing measurements using Newtonian and shear thinning fluids. For small monodisperse rugosities, front spreading is diffusive with a dominant geometrical dispersion (dispersion coefficient $D \propto Pe$) at low Péclet numbers $Pe$; at higher $Pe$ values one has either $D \propto Pe^2$ ({\it i.e.} Taylor dispersion) for obstacles of height smaller than the gap or $D \propto Pe^{1.35}$ for obstacles bridging the gap. For a self affine multiscale roughness like in actual rocks and a relative shear displacement $\vec{\delta}$ of complementary walls, the aperture field is channelized in the direction perpendicular to $\delta$. For a mean velocity $\vec{U}$ parallel to the channels, the global front geometry reflects the velocity contrast between them and is predicted from the aperture field. For $\vec{U}$ perpendicular to the channels, global front spreading is much reduced. Local spreading of the front thickness remains mostly controlled by Taylor dispersion except in the case of a very strong channelization parallel to $\vec U$.
Fluid Dynamics,Geophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?