Abstract:Introduction: People with disabilities are underrepresented in higher education, facing systematic obstacles such as inaccessible communication and physical environments and difficulties obtaining accommodations. This study aims to shed light on barriers to accessibility and disability inclusion in research institutions through confidential qualitative interviews with researchers with disabilities. Methods: We recruited participants via virtual flyers. Eligibility criteria included working in the United States (U.S.) as researchers that had applied for grant funding (last five years), and self-identifying as having a disability. We offered participants (total n = 35) the option of either semi-structured one-on-one live or written interviews based on their preference. Two study team members analyzed written and live responses using thematic analysis to identify themes. Results: Themes included identity/visibility, career trajectories, accessibility, accommodations, bias, representation, and inclusion. Some participants reported not disclosing their disabilities at work or during hiring processes due to fear of negative perceptions from peers or potential employers. Experiences around stigma and bias were noted both in professional relationships and when interacting with disability service offices, underscoring difficulties and delays in processes to secure accommodations. Respondents highlighted the lack of disability inclusion and low representation of people with disabilities in academia and elevated the importance of self-advocacy and of role models and mentors in shaping career pathways for future researchers with disabilities. Conclusion: Researchers with disabilities encounter systematic barriers at academic institutions, and lack of acknowledgement and research on these experiences has held back institutional and policy changes. To reduce disparities for researchers with disabilities, academic leadership must allocate resources to address ableism, create more inclusive environments, and raise standards beyond compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

'There's a lot of privilege masquerading as merit': why inclusion matters in academia

A Dynamical Systems Description of Privilege, Power and Leadership in Academia: identifying barriers and paths to inclusive communities of excellent scholarship

Double standards in promotion and tenure

‘Culture is a Meritocracy’: Why Creative Workers’ Attitudes may Reinforce Social Inequality

Affirmative action and employment equity in the professions: Backlash fueled by individualism and meritocracy

Discussing systemic racism and racial privilege at a large, academic health center using a modified privilege walk

Experiences of researchers with disabilities at academic institutions in the United States

Barriers and Facilitators to the Success of Black Academic Physicians

Racial Inequality in Academia: Systemic Origins, Modern Challenges, and Policy Recommendations

Epistemic exclusion: A theory for understanding racism in faculty research evaluations.

Revising evaluation metrics for graduate admissions and faculty advancement to dismantle privilege

Blackface in White Space: Using Admissions to Address Racism in Medical Education

Academic ethics of mental health: the national black postdocs framework for the addressment of support for undergraduate and graduate trainees

How to be an effective ally

Racial and ethnic imbalance in neuroscience reference lists and intersections with gender

Pride-and-Prejudice Perspectives of Marginalization Can Advance Science and Society

Myths of Meritocracy, Friendship, and Fun Work: Class and Gender in North American Academic Communities

Seeking inclusion while navigating exclusion: Theorizing the experiences of disabled nursing faculty in academe

Before allyship: A model of integrating awareness of a privileged social identity

Racism, equity and inclusion in research funding

White Attitudes toward Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action