Abstract:This meta‐analysis demonstrates no improvement in anastomotic leak outcomes with the approach to anastomosis. Stapled anastomosis was associated with a pooled reduction in the odds of composite anastomotic complication in trauma patients. However, the foundation for these results is based on lower quality studies. Background Approach to enteric anastomotic technique has been a subject of debate, with no clear consensus as to whether handsewn or stapled techniques are superior in trauma settings, which are influenced by unique perturbances to important processes such as immune function, coagulation, wound healing and response to infection. This systematic review and meta‐analysis compares the risk of anastomotic complications in trauma patients with gastrointestinal injury requiring restoration of continuity with handsewn versus staples approaches. Methods A comprehensive computer assisted search of electronic databases Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central was performed. Comparative studies evaluating stapled versus handsewn gastrointestinal anastomoses in trauma patients were included in this review. All anastomoses involving small intestine to small intestine, small to large intestine, and large intestine to large intestine were eligible. Anastomosis to the rectum was excluded. Outcomes evaluated were (1) anastomotic leak (AL) (2) a composite anastomotic complication (CAC) end point consisting of AL, enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) and deep abdominal abscess. Results Eight studies involving 931 patients were included and of these patients, data from 790 patients were available for analysis. There was no significant difference identified for anastomotic leak between the two groups (OR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.24–2.45; P = 0.66). There was no significant improvement in composite anastomotic complication; defined as a composite of anastomotic leak, deep intra‐abdominal abscess and intra‐abdominal fistula, in the stapled anastomosis group (OR = 1.05; 95% CI 0.53–2.09; P = 0.90). Overall, there was limited evidence to suggest superiority with handsewn or stapled anastomosis for improving AL or CAC, however this was based on studies of moderate to high risk of bias with poor control for confounders. Discussion This meta‐analysis demonstrates no superiority improvement in anastomotic outcomes with handsewn or stapled repair. These findings may represent no effect in anastomotic outcome by technique for all situations. However, considering the paucity of information on potential confounders, perhaps there is a difference in outcome with overall technique or for specific subgroups that have not been described due to limited sample size and data on confounders. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend an anastomotic technique in trauma.

Comparative retrospective study on surgical outcomes of hand‐sewn anastomosis versus stapling anastomosis for colectomy using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan with propensity score matching

A Novel Knotless Hand-Sewn End-to-end Anastomosis Using V-loc Barbed Suture Vs. Stapled Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Left Colonic Surgery: A Propensity Scoring Match Analysis

Stapled Side-to-Side Anastomosis Might Be Better Than Handsewn End-to-End Anastomosis in Ileocolic Resection for Crohn’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis

P526 Handsewn versus Stapled Ileocolic Anastomosis for Crohn's: Comparable Outcomes Despite More Severe Disease Profile in the Handsewn Group

Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety

Comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

P575 Kono-S anastomosis reduces post-op intervention after ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease

Robotic purse-string suture technique for intracorporeal anastomosis using double-stapling technique in robotic resection of rectal and sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

Stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses after bowel resection in patients with crohn disease

Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of stapled and manual coloanal anastomosis.

Optimising surgical anastomosis in ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease with respect to recurrence and functionality: two international parallel randomized controlled trials comparing handsewn (END-to-end or Kono-S) to stapled anastomosis (HAND2END and the End2End STUDIES)

Usefulness of a powered circular stapler compared with a manual circular stapler in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: A retrospective cohort study and systematic review

Comparison of Hand-Sewn with Stapled Anastomosis in Neonatal Intestinal Atresia Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study

The impact of stapled compared to handsewn repair on anastomotic outcomes in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Comparing Outcomes Between Side‐to‐Side Anastomosis and Other Anastomotic Configurations after Intestinal Resection for Patients with Crohn’s Disease: A Meta‐Analysis

Comparative analysis of manual vs. mechanical suturing techniques in esophagectomy: A propensity score‐matched study of long‐term outcomes

Curative Effect Comparison between Single Stapling Double Pouch Suturing and Double Stapling for Colorectal Anastomosis in the Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancers

Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for locally advanced colon cancer in obese patients: a nationwide, multicenter, propensity score-based analysis of short- and long-term outcomes

Comparison of different anastomosis methods in laparoscopically assisted left hemicolectomy

腹腔鏡下右側結腸癌手術の体腔内・体腔外吻合の比較検討

Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in the Neck: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials