Optimising surgical anastomosis in ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease with respect to recurrence and functionality: two international parallel randomized controlled trials comparing handsewn (END-to-end or Kono-S) to stapled anastomosis (HAND2END and the End2End STUDIES)

Anouck E. G. Haanappel,Vittoria Bellato,Christianne J. Buskens,Alessandro Armuzzi,Jarmila D. W. van der Bilt,Nanne K. H. de Boer,Silvio Danese,Eline M. L. van der Does de Willebois,Marjolijn Duijvestein,Daniëlle van der Horst,Gianluca Pellino,Milan C. Richir,Francesco Selvaggi,Antonino Spinelli,Andrea Vignali,Riccardo Rosati,Willem A. Bemelman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02340-3
2024-02-29
BMC Surgery
Abstract:The most common intestinal operation in Crohn's disease (CD) is an ileocolic resection. Despite optimal surgical and medical management, recurrent disease after surgery is common. Different types of anastomoses with respect to configuration and construction can be made after resection for example, handsewn (end-to-end and Kono-S) and stapled (side-to-side). The various types of anastomoses might affect endoscopic recurrence and its assessment, the functional outcome, and costs. The objective of the present study is to compare the three types of anastomoses with respect to endoscopic recurrence at 6 months, gastrointestinal function, and health care consumption.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?