Abstract:In 2021 I noted that in all information-based systems we understand, Cognition creates Code, which controls Chemical reactions. Known agents write software which controls hardware, and not the other way around. I proposed the same is true in all of biology. Though the textbook description of cause and effect in biology proposes the reverse, that Chemical reactions produce Code from which Cognition emerges, there are no examples in the literature demonstrating either step. A mathematical proof for the first step, cognition generating code, is based on Turing's halting problem. The second step, code controlling chemical reactions, is the role of the genetic code. Thus a central question in biology: What is the nature and source of cognition? In this paper I propose a relationship between biology and Quantum Mechanics (QM), hypothesizing that the same principle that enables an observer to collapse a wave function also grants biology its agency: the organism's ability to act on the world instead of merely being a passive recipient. Just as all living cells are cognitive (Shapiro 2021, 2007; McClintock 1984; Lyon 2015; Levin 2019; Pascal and Pross, 2022), I propose humans are quantum observers because we are made of cells and all cells are observers. This supports the century-old view that in QM, the observer does not merely record the event but plays a fundamental role in its outcome.The classical world is driven by laws, which are deductive; the quantum world is driven by choices, which are inductive. When the two are combined, they form the master feedback loop of perception and action for all biology. In this paper I apply basic definitions of induction, deduction and computation to known properties of QM to show that the organism altering itself (and its environment) is a whole shaping its parts. It is not merely parts comprising a whole. I propose that an observer collapsing the wave function is the physical mechanism for producing negentropy. The way forward in solving the information problem in biology is understanding the relationship between cognition and QM.

On two quantum approaches to adaptive mutations in bacteria

Could Quantum-Mediated Bacterial Signaling Explain Adaptive Mutation?

Entangled Evolution Model: Application to Adaptive Mutation

Quantum information processing at the cellular level. Euclidean approach

Extended error threshold mechanism in {\it quasispecies} theory via population dynamics

A simple model describing evolution of genomic GC content with random perturbations in asexually reproducing organisms

Ongoing Phenotypic and Genomic Changes in Experimental Coevolution of RNA Bacteriophage Qβ and Escherichia Coli

The role of quantum mechanics in cognition-based evolution

Quantum selfish gene (biological evolution in terms of quantum mechanics)

Modulation of Base Specific Mutation and Recombination Rates Enables Functional Adaptation within the Context of the Genetic Code

Probabilistic and Flux Landscapes of the Phage $λ$ Genetic Switch

Global Relationships in Fluctuation and Response in Adaptive Evolution

Fluctuation Theorem for the Mutation Process in in Vitro Evolution

Mutation and evolution: Conceptual possibilities

Collective Fluctuations in models of adaptation

Error Thresholds in Presence of Epistatic Interactions

Quasispecies dynamics with time lags and periodic fluctuations in replication

Evolutionary Design in Biological Quantum Computing

Enzyme regulation and mutation in a model serial dilution ecosystem

Mutation rate variability as a driving force in adaptive evolution

A comparative study between discrete and continuum models for the evolution of competing phenotype-structured cell populations in dynamical environments