Abstract:Background Recently, computed tomography (CT) manufacturers have developed deep‐learning‐based reconstruction algorithms to compensate for the limitations of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms, such as image smoothing and the spatial resolution's dependence on contrast and dose levels. Purpose To assess the impact of an artificial intelligence deep‐learning reconstruction (AI‐DLR) algorithm on image quality and dose reduction compared with a hybrid IR algorithm in chest CT for different clinical indications. Methods Acquisitions on the CT American College of Radiology (ACR) 464 and CT Torso CTU‐41 phantoms were performed at five dose levels (CTDIvol: 9.5/7.5/6/2.5/0.4 mGy) used for chest CT conditions. Raw data were reconstructed using filtered backprojection, two levels of IR (iDose4 levels 4 (i4) and 7 (i7)), and five levels of AI‐DLR (Precise Image; Smoother, Smooth, Standard, Sharp, Sharper). Noise power spectrum (NPS), task‐based transfer function, and detectability index (d′) were computed: d′‐modeled detection of a soft tissue mediastinal nodule (low‐contrast soft tissue chest nodule within the mediastinum [LCN]), ground‐glass opacity (GGO), or high‐contrast pulmonary (HCP) lesion. The subjective image quality of chest anthropomorphic phantom images was independently evaluated by two radiologists. They assessed image noise, image smoothing, contrast between vessels and fat in the mediastinum for mediastinal images, visual border detection between bronchus and lung parenchyma for parenchymal images, and overall image quality using a commonly used four‐ or five‐point scale. Results From Standard to Smoother levels, on average, the noise magnitude decreased (for all dose levels: −66.3% ± 0.5% for mediastinal images and −63.1% ± 0.1% for parenchymal images), the average NPS spatial frequency decreased (for all dose levels: −35.3% ± 2.2% for mediastinal images and −13.3% ± 2.2% for parenchymal images), and the detectability (d′) of the three lesions increased. The opposite pattern was found from Standard to Sharper levels. From Smoother to Sharper levels, the spatial resolution increased for the low‐contrast polyethylene insert and the opposite for the high‐contrast air insert. Compared to the i4 used in clinical practice, d′ values were higher using Smoother (mean for all dose levels: 338.7% ± 29.4%), Smooth (103.4% ± 11.2%), and Standard (34.1% ± 6.6%) levels for the LCN on mediastinal images and Smoother (169.5% ± 53.2% for GGO and 136.9% ± 1.6% for HCP) and Smooth (36.4% ± 22.1% and 24.1% ± 0.9%, respectively) levels for parenchymal images. Radiologists considered the images satisfactory for clinical use at these levels, but adaptation to the dose level of the protocol is required. Conclusion With AI‐DLR, the smoothest levels reduced the noise and improved the detectability of chest lesions but increased the image smoothing. The opposite was found with the sharpest levels. The choice of level depends on the dose level and type of image: mediastinal or parenchymal.

Influence of Deep Learning Based Image Reconstruction on Quantitative Results of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring

Influence of deep learning image reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V on coronary artery calcium quantification

Coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison between filtered-back projection, hybrid iterative reconstruction, and deep learning reconstruction techniques

Radiation dose reduction with deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography

A Deep-Learning Reconstruction Algorithm That Improves the Image Quality of Low-Tube-voltage Coronary CT Angiography

Multicenter Comparison of AI Deep Learning Reconstruction, Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection for Coronary Artery Calcification Scoring

Ultralow dose coronary calcium scoring CT at reduced tube voltage and current by using deep learning image reconstruction

Image Quality of Coronary CT Angiography at Ultra Low Tube Voltage Reconstructed with a Deep-Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm in Patients of Different Weight

Effect of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction on Image Quality and Pericoronary Fat Attenuation Index

Improved image quality in CT pulmonary angiography using deep learning-based image reconstruction

The impact of deep learning reconstruction on image quality and coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve values

Diagnostic Improvements of Deep Learning–Based Image Reconstruction for Assessing Calcification-Related Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithms in Low-Dose Radiation Abdominal Computed Tomography: Assessment of Image Quality and Lesion Diagnostic Confidence

Deep learning reconstruction algorithm and high-concentration contrast medium: feasibility of a double-low protocol in coronary computed tomography angiography

Improvement in Image Quality and Visibility of Coronary Arteries, Stents, and Valve Structures on CT Angiography by Deep Learning Reconstruction

Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study

Impact of an artificial intelligence deep‐learning reconstruction algorithm for CT on image quality and potential dose reduction: A phantom study

Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality and lesion visibility in renal computed tomography at different doses

The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images

Improving Image Quality and Resolution of Coronary Arteries in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography by Using High-Definition Scans and Deep Learning Image Reconstruction

Computed Tomography Effective Dose and Image Quality in Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Intensive Care Patients Compared to Iterative Algorithms