Abstract:OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS This paper synthesizes the current literature on industrial-use, active and passive upper-limb exoskeletons, as an aid to health and safety specialists, ergonomics practitioners, and policy-makers that may be considering or regulating their use. Reported here are the effects of exoskeleton use on muscular activity; endurance and fatigue; kinematics and range of motion; productivity and quality; discomfort and pain; and usability and subjective feedback. A moderate level of evidence emerged, supporting the efficacy of passive upper limb exoskeletons in reducing muscular demands on the anterior and middle deltoid during occupational tasks, primarily those tasks involving overhead work. Given the nascence of research in this area, however, there is insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of active upper limb exoskeletons. Practitioners are encouraged to explore the effectiveness of passive exoskeleton use to reduce musculoskeletal disorder risk, particularly for overhead work. However, more research on the efficacy of active exoskeletons is recommended prior to field trials. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: Recently, interest has surged regarding industrial-use exoskeletons as personal protective equipment to reduce work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Purpose: Reviews existing evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of industrial-use upper limb exoskeletons for reducing exposures to factors linked to MSD risk, and for improving productivity and quality. Methods: Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL were searched systematically for relevant, English, peer-reviewed journal articles published between January 2000 and February 2019. Retained papers were quality-appraised using a modified CONSORT 2010 checklist, where an evidence synthesis algorithm was used to determine the level of evidence separately for active and passive exoskeletons. Results: A total of 799 articles were retrieved, 14 articles of which met inclusion criteria and were retained for analysis. Studies commonly reported on the effects of exoskeleton use on measures of muscular activity; endurance and fatigue; kinematics and range of motion; productivity and quality; discomfort and pain; and usability and subjective feedback. A moderate level of evidence was found supporting the efficacy of passive upper limb exoskeletons in reducing muscular demand on the anterior and middle deltoid muscles during occupational tasks, particularly overhead work; however, there is limited and insufficient evidence regarding impacts on measures related to kinematics and fatigue. There is insufficient evidence to support the use of active exoskeletons, due to the lack of medium-to-high quality studies with consistent findings. Conclusions: Considering the current state of evidence, those considering upper-limb exoskeletons for MSD prevention, particular for overhead work, may wish to consider passive systems rather than active systems at this time. High-quality research should continue to investigate the efficacy of active systems and effectiveness of both active and passive exoskeletons as an intervention to reduce MSDs. Exoskeleton efficacy and effectiveness research quality can be improved by including samples representative of industrial workers and by strengthening study power.

Effects of upper-limb exoskeleton on muscle activity in tasks requiring arm elevation: Part II – In-field experiments in construction industry settings

Impact of a passive upper-body exoskeleton on muscular activity and precision in overhead single and dual tasks: an explorative randomized crossover study

Effects of an industrial passive assistive exoskeleton on muscle activity, oxygen consumption and subjective responses during lifting tasks

The effects of working with a passive arm-support exoskeleton on objective and self-reported measures during field tasks – a randomised cross-over study

Effects of using an active hand exoskeleton for drilling tasks: A pilot study

Considerations for Industrial Use: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Active and Passive Upper Limb Exoskeletons on Physical Exposures

The Effects of Upper-Body Exoskeletons on Human Metabolic Cost and Thermal Response during Work Tasks—A Systematic Review

Field assessment of active BSE: Trends over test days of subjective indicators and self-reported fatigue for railway construction workers

Biomechanical Effects of Using a Passive Exoskeleton for the Upper Limb in Industrial Manufacturing Activities: A Pilot Study

Industrial exoskeletons from bench to field: Human-machine interface and user experience in occupational settings and tasks

A comparative study of biomechanical assessments in laboratory and field settings for manual material handling tasks using extractor tools and exoskeletons

Evaluation of a passive arm-support exoskeleton for surgical team members: Results from live surgeries

Exoskeletons for workers: A case series study in an enclosures production line

Evaluation of antigravitational support levels provided by a passive upper-limb occupational exoskeleton in repetitive arm movements

The effects of exoskeleton use on human response to simulated overhead tasks with vibration

Effects of a back-assist exosuit in lab-based approximations of construction tasks performed by novices and experienced construction workers

Development of an ergonomic wearable robotic device for assisting manual workers

Effect of an upper body exoskeleton for surgeons on postoperative neck, back and shoulder complaints

Active exoskeleton reduces erector spinae muscle activity during lifting

Assessment of a passive wearable robot for reducing low back disorders during rebar work

Musculoskeletal models determine the effect of a soft active exosuit on muscle activations and forces during lifting and lowering tasks