Comment on "Drip Paintings and Fractal Analysis", <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0710.4917v2" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4917v2">arXiv:0710.4917v2</a>, by K. Jones-Smith, H. Mathur and L.M. Krauss

A.P. Micolich,B.C. Scannell,M.S. Fairbanks,T.P. Martin,R.P. Taylor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0712.1652
2007-12-11
Abstract:In a recent manuscript (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0710.4917v2" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4917v2">arXiv:0710.4917v2</a>), Jones-Smith et al. attempt to use the well-established box-counting technique for fractal analysis to "demonstrate conclusively that fractal criteria are not useful for authentication". Here, in response to what we view to be an extremely simplistic misrepresentation of our earlier work by Jones-Smith et al., we reiterate our position regarding the potential of fractal analysis for artwork authentication. We also point out some of the flaws in the analysis presented in by Jones-Smith et al.
Statistical Mechanics,Physics and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?