Abstract:A reasonably general theory for predicting the outcome of coevolution among interacting species is developed. It is applied to a model for resource partitioning among competing species.Current theory for resource partitioning is based on derivations of a “limiting similarity”—i.e., a limit to how similar competitors can be to one another consistent with coexistence. This theory presumes there is a mechanism, perhaps invasion and extinction, which causes competitors to attain the limiting similarity. The view taken in this paper is that partitioning is an evolutionary compromise between pressures for character displacement and disadvantages inherent in the shift to different resource types.A set of principles is offered for the evolution of the parameters in ecological models. (1) For single population models natural selection causes the parameters ultimately to assume those values which produce the highest equilibrium population size. (2) For models of interacting populations, but without interspecific frequency-dependence, natural selection causes the parameters to assume values which produce either the highest or lowest equilibrium population size for any species depending on the sign of the “feedback” in the community obtained by deleting that species. (3) For models of interacting populations with interspecific frequency dependence natural selection leads to parameter values which produce intermediate equilibrium population sizes. A function called the conditional equilibrium population size is introduced. Provided (a) the mean fitness is a maximum in each species at a stable coevolutionary equilibrium and (b) there is negative density-dependence in each species then natural selection causes the parameters to assume values which produce the highest conditional equilibrium population size for each species.These coevolutionary principles, applied to a model for resource partitioning, entail that the niche separation between species relative to given niche widths, increases with the variety of available resources and decreases with the number of competing populations. Also, the evolution of character displacement between two species does not proceed far enough to maximize the equilibrium population sizes of the species involved. These results imply that the relationship between the niche overlap (of nearest neighbors) and species diversity is qualitatively different depending on whether the variety of resources at any place covaries with the species diversity there. Without covariation niche overlap increases with species diversity; with covariation overlap may decrease with species diversity. This study provides the beginning of a theory for the convergent evolution of community structure.

The logistic equation and a critique of the theory of natural selection

Three Logistic Models for the Two-Species Interactions: Symbiosis, Predator-Prey and Competition

Competition theory, evolution, and the concept of an ecological niche

A Non-equilibrium Thermodynamic Framework for the Dynamics and Stability of Ecosystems

Directionality Theory and the Entropic Principle of Natural Selection

Learning Dynamics and the Co-Evolution of Competing Sexual Species

Reaction–diffusion equations of two species competing for two complementary resources with internal storage

Reconsidering the logical structure of the theory of natural selection

Resource partitioning among competing species—A coevolutionary approach

Steady state coexistence solutions of reaction-diffusion competition models

A note on differential equations of logistic type

Tests of the standard electroweak model in beta decay

Extinctions as a vestige of instability: the geometry of stability and feasibility

Biodiversity, extinctions and evolution of ecosystems with shared resources

Unpacking sublinear growth: diversity, stability and coexistence

Natural selection from the perspective of mathematical and physical laws

The advantage of being slow: the quasi-neutral contact process

Global attractors and extinction dynamics of cyclically competing species

On disagreements of theories of evolution

Rethinking the logistic approach for population dynamics of mutualistic interactions

Eco-evolutionary "fitness" in 3 dimensions: absolute growth, absolute efficiency, and relative competitiveness