A comparison of confidence distribution approaches for rare event meta‐analysis
Brinley N. Zabriskie,Chris Corcoran,Pralay Senchaudhuri
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9125
2021-07-04
Statistics in Medicine
Abstract:Meta-analysis of rare event data has recently received increasing attention due to the challenging issues rare events pose to traditional meta-analytic methods. One specific way to combine information and analyze rare event meta-analysis data utilizes confidence distributions (CDs). While several CD methods exist, no comparisons have been made to determine which method is best suited for homogeneous or heterogeneous meta-analyses with rare events. In this article, we review several CD methods: Fisher's classic P-value combination method, one that combines P-value functions, another that combines confidence intervals, and one that combines confidence log-likelihood functions. We compare these CD approaches, and we propose and compare variations of these methods to determine which method produces reliable results for homogeneous or heterogeneous rare event meta-analyses. We find that for homogeneous rare event data, most CD methods perform very well. On the other hand, for heterogeneous rare event data, there is a clear split in performance between some CD methods, with some performing very poorly and others performing reasonably well.
public, environmental & occupational health,medicine, research & experimental,medical informatics,mathematical & computational biology,statistics & probability