Abstract:We apply a Bayesian agent-based framework inspired by QBism to iterations of two quantum games, the CHSH game and the quantum prisoners' dilemma. In each two-player game, players hold beliefs about an amount of shared entanglement and about the actions or beliefs of the other player. Each takes actions which maximize their expected utility and revises their beliefs with the classical Bayes rule between rounds. We simulate iterated play to see if and how players can learn about the presence of shared entanglement and to explore how their performance, their beliefs, and the game's structure interrelate. In the CHSH game, we find that players can learn that entanglement is present and use this to achieve quantum advantage. We find that they can only do so if they also believe the other player will act correctly to exploit the entanglement. In the case of low or zero entanglement in the CHSH game, the players cannot achieve quantum advantage, even in the case where they believe the entanglement is higher than it is. For the prisoners dilemma, we show that assuming 1-fold rational players (rational players who believe the other player is also rational) reduces the quantum extension [Eisert, Wilkens, and Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3077 (1999)] of the prisoners dilemma to a game with only two strategies, one of which (defect) is dominant for low entanglement, and the other (the quantum strategy Q) is dominant for high entanglement. For intermediate entanglement, neither strategy is dominant. We again show that players can learn entanglement in iterated play. We also show that strong belief in entanglement causes optimal play even in the absence of entanglement -- showing that belief in entanglement is acting as a proxy for the players trusting each other. Our work points to possible future applications in resource detection and quantum algorithm design.

Arbiter as the Third Man in classical and quantum games

Identifying the value of a random variable unambiguously: Quantum versus classical approaches

Studies in the Theory of Quantum Games

A game theoretical perspective on the quantum probabilities associated with a GHZ state

Quantum advice enhances social optimality in three-party conflicting interest games

Resolving game theoretical dilemmas with quantum states

Permissible extensions of classical to quantum games combining three strategies

Quantum Game Players Can Have Advantage Without Discord

Quantum Bayesian Games

Quantization of Games: Towards Quantum Artificial Intelligence

Characterizing the Nash equilibria of a three-player Bayesian quantum game

Bell violations through independent bases games

Quantum games on evolving random networks

Quantum Strategies in Moving Frames

Playing Games with Quantum Mechanics

Quantum Game with Incomplete Information

Quantum Games and Programmable Quantum Systems

Constructing quantum games from non-factorizable joint probabilities

The PSR J0514-4002A binary system in NGC 1851