Abstract:The introduction of partially twisted boundary conditions allows weak and electromagnetic form factors to be evaluated at specified values of the hadronic momenta (and hence momentum transfers) in lattice simulations. We present and demonstrate this technique for the computation of the K->pi semileptonic form factor at zero momentum transfer and for the electromagnetic form factor of the pion at arbitrarily small momentum transfers. These exploratory computations are carried out in full QCD with 3 flavours of sea quarks, but with only two values of m_u=m_d which limits our ability to perform the chiral extrapolations. The results should therefore be viewed primarily as a demonstration of the feasibility of the method. For the K-> pi form factor we compare the new technique to the conventional approach and for the pion form factor we assess our results for very small momentum transfer with the help of chiral perturbation theory.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to explore the relationship between two types of robustness in biological systems and how the stochasticity in gene expression affects the formation of these robustness during the evolutionary process. Specifically, the author focuses on: 1. **Developmental Robustness**: An individual's ability to resist internal and external fluctuations during growth and development. 2. **Genetic Robustness**: The ability of a biological system to resist mutations between generations. The questions raised by the author are: - Is there a connection between these two types of robustness? - Is the stochasticity in gene expression related to the evolution of these two types of robustness? To answer these questions, the author studied how a network acquires these two types of robustness under the action of mutation and selection by simulating a simple stochastic gene - expression network. The key to the study lies in understanding the role of noise in gene expression and its impact on the evolution of robustness. ### Main Conclusions The main conclusions of the paper include: - In order for the network to acquire both developmental robustness and genetic robustness simultaneously, the phenotypic variance caused by mutation must be less than the phenotypic variance of isogenic individuals. That is, \( V_{\text{ip}} \geq V_{\text{g}} \), where \( V_{\text{ip}} \) is the phenotypic variance of isogenic individuals and \( V_{\text{g}} \) is the phenotypic variance caused by genetic diversity. - Genetic robustness will only evolve when the noise intensity in gene expression exceeds a certain threshold. This indicates that noise plays an active role in the evolutionary process. - During the evolutionary process, as the noise intensity increases, both variances \( V_{\text{ip}} \) and \( V_{\text{g}} \) will decrease, indicating that robustness gradually increases. - The study reveals how the noise encountered by cells during growth and development shapes the robustness of the gene - expression network to stochasticity, which in turn affects its robustness to mutations. ### Summary of Mathematical Formulas - Developmental robustness can be measured by the phenotypic variance of isogenic individuals \( V_{\text{ip}}(a)=\int (x - x(a))^{2}P(x, a) \, dx \), where \( x(a) \) is the average phenotype of a clonal population with the same genotype \( a \). - Genetic robustness can be measured by the phenotypic variance of individuals with different genotypes \( V_{\text{g}}=\int (x(a)-\langle x \rangle)^{2}P(a) \, da \), where \( P(a) \) is the distribution of genotype \( a \) and \(\langle x \rangle \) is the average phenotype of all genotypes. - The key inequality is \( V_{\text{ip}} \geq V_{\text{g}} \), and only when this condition is met can the system evolve higher robustness. Through these studies, the author quantitatively reveals the importance of noise in the evolutionary process and proposes the relationship between noise intensity and the evolution of robustness.

Hadronic form factors in Lattice QCD at small and vanishing momentum transfer

Shaping Robust System through Evolution

Evolution of Robustness and Plasticity under Environmental Fluctuation: Formulation in terms of Phenotypic Variances

Gene network robustness as a multivariate character

Phenotype selection due to mutational robustness

Emergence of robustness against noise: A structural phase transition in evolved models of gene regulatory networks

Congruent evolution of genetic and environmental robustness in microRNA

Phenotypic robustness can increase phenotypic variability after non-genetic perturbations in gene regulatory circuits

Stochasticity in genetics and gene regulation

Unifying (simple) models of genetic robustness and evolvability

Relationship among Phenotypic Plasticity, Genetic and Epigenetic Fluctuations, Robustness, and Evolovability; Waddington's Legacy revisited under the Spirit of Einstein

Robustness as an Evolutionary Principle

Innovation and robustness in complex regulatory gene networks

Robustness and evolvability: Revisited, redefined and applied

Gene expression noise accelerates the evolution of a biological oscillator

Robustness under Functional Constraint: The Genetic Network for Temporal Expression in Drosophila Neurogenesis

Emergent Network Structure, evolvable Robustness and non-linear Effects of Point Mutations in an Artificial Genome Model

Emergence of cooperative bistability and robustness of gene regulatory networks

Network Structure and Dynamics, and Emergence of Robustness by Stabilizing Selection in an Artificial Genome

Using Gene Expression Noise to Understand Gene Regulation

Gene expression noise can promote the fixation of beneficial mutations in fluctuating environments