Metric gravity theories and cosmology. I. Physical interpretation and viability

Leszek M. Sokolowski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/24/13/015
2007-06-27
Abstract:We critically review some concepts underlying current applications of gravity theories with Lagrangians depending on the full Riemann tensor to cosmology. We argue that it is impossible to reconstruct the underlying Lagrangian from the observational data: the Robertson-Walker spacetime is so simple and "flexible" that any cosmic evolution may be fitted by infinite number of Lagrangians. Confrontation of a solution with the astronomical data is obstructed by the existence of many frames of dynamical variables and the fact that initial data for the gravitational triplet depend on which frame is minimally coupled to ordinary matter. Prior to any application it is necessary to establish physical contents and viability of a given gravity theory.
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate and discuss the validity and feasibility of using non - linear gravitational theories (especially gravitational theories in the form of \(L = f(g_{\mu\nu}, R^{\alpha\beta}_{\mu\nu})\)) to explain the phenomenon of the accelerating expansion of the universe. Specifically, the author focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Possibility of theoretical reconstruction**: The author points out that it is infeasible to reconstruct the function \(f\) from astronomical observation data, whether for cosmological or intra - solar - system observations. This is because the Robertson - Walker spacetime is too simple and "flexible", and almost any cosmic evolution process can be fitted by countless different Lagrangians. 2. **Physical meaning and applicability of the theory**: Any gravitational theory different from general relativity will generate new cosmological theories, and even if a single solution fits the observation data well, all the successes of the standard cosmological model will be lost. Therefore, before applying a certain gravitational theory to cosmology or other fields, its physical content and applicability must be established. 3. **Stability conditions**: The author proposes that a basic and easily applicable criterion for the feasibility of any gravitational theory is the existence of a stable ground - state solution, which can be Minkowski space, de Sitter space or anti - de Sitter space. The stability of the ground - state is independent of which framework is physical. 4. **Form of the dynamical equations**: By transforming the initial Lagrangian into the Helmholtz Lagrangian through the Legendre transformation, the equations of motion can be made into second - order equations, that is, the Einstein field equations with additional mass spin - 0 fields and spin - 2 fields. The difference between different gravitational theories lies only in the form of the interaction terms between these two fields and the metric. 5. **Choice of initial conditions**: The initial conditions of the two fields in the gravitational triplet depend on which framework (i.e., the set of dynamic variables) is physical (i.e., matter is minimally coupled within it). This fact and the diversity of possible frameworks impede the comparison of the solutions of the equations of motion with the observation data. 6. **Reconstruction problems of the theory**: The author emphasizes that it is fundamentally impossible to reconstruct the underlying Lagrangian from the known Robertson - Walker solutions. Relativistic metric theories are too complex, making it impossible to reconstruct differential equations from approximate solutions. In conclusion, this paper aims to critically examine the current conceptual basis for applying non - linear gravitational theories to explain the accelerating expansion of the universe, and to explore the physical meaning, applicability and reconstruction possibilities of these theories.