Abstract:Some modified two-slit interference experiments claim to demonstrate a violation of Bohr's complementarity principle. A typical such experiment is theoretically analyzed using wave-packet dynamics. The flaw in the analysis of such experiments is pointed out and it is demonstrated that they do not violate complementarity. In addition, it is quite generally proved that if the state of a particle is such that the modulus square of the wave-function yields an interference pattern, then it necessarily loses which-path information.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether the modified double - slit experiment violates Bohr's complementarity principle. Specifically, some modified double - slit interference experiments claim to be able to show violations of Bohr's complementarity principle. The author analyzes these experiments through wave - packet dynamics and points out the flaws in the interpretation of these experiments, ultimately proving that they do not violate the complementarity principle.
### Background of the Complementarity Principle
Bohr's complementarity principle states that the wave - like and particle - like properties of a quantum system are mutually exclusive. In the double - slit experiment, if "path information" can be obtained (i.e., knowing which slit the particle passes through), then the interference pattern will disappear; conversely, if an interference pattern is observed, then path information cannot be obtained. This principle has been verified in multiple experiments, including the quantum erasure experiment.
### Controversy over the Modified Double - Slit Experiment
In recent years, some experiments have proposed and carried out so - called "modified double - slit experiments", claiming that path information can be retained and an interference pattern can be observed simultaneously, thus violating the complementarity principle. The specific setups of these experiments usually include:
- Using a converging lens to capture photons and form two images.
- Inserting thin wires at the positions of dark fringes to detect the existence of an interference pattern without directly observing photons.
The authors of these experiments believe that after inserting the thin wires, the light intensity received by the detector does not change significantly, indicating the existence of an interference pattern, so they claim that this shows a violation of the complementarity principle.
### Core Arguments of the Paper
The author points out the following through theoretical analysis of these experiments:
1. **Relationship between Path Information and Interference Pattern**: The author proves that if the state of a particle is such that the square of the modulus of its wave function exhibits an interference pattern, then it must have lost path information.
2. **Wave - Packet Dynamics Analysis**: Through wave - packet dynamics, the particle behavior in the double - slit experiment is analyzed in detail, showing that even in the modified experiment, path information is still lost when interference occurs.
3. **Mathematical Derivation**: Using the basic principles of quantum mechanics, especially the orthogonality condition, it is proved that the state within the interference region cannot contain path information.
### Conclusion
The conclusion of the paper is that although the modified double - slit experiment does show a real interference phenomenon, the photons detected by the detector do not provide any path information. Therefore, these experiments do not violate Bohr's complementarity principle. The complementarity principle is one of the foundations of quantum mechanics and is robust and will not be violated by this type of experiment.
### Formula Summary
The key formulas involved in the paper are as follows:
1. Wave function of the initial state:
\[
\psi(y,0) = a \left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right)^{1/4} \frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon}} e^{-(y - y_0)^2/\epsilon^2} + b \left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right)^{1/4} \frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon}} e^{-(y + y_0)^2/\epsilon^2}
\]
2. Wave function after time evolution:
\[
\psi(y,t) = a C(t) e^{-(y - y_0)^2 / (\epsilon^2 + 2i\hbar t/m)} + b C(t) e^{-(y + y_0)^2 / (\epsilon^2 + 2i\hbar t/m)}
\]
where,
\[
C(t) = \frac{1}{\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right)^{1/4} \sqrt{\epsilon + 2i\hbar t/m}}
\]
3. Orthogonality condition:
\[
\langle \alpha | \beta \rangle + \langle \beta | \alpha \rangle = 2
\]
Through these formulas and analysis, the paper effectively proves the non - violability of the complementarity principle.