Abstract:For a Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) aerosol source apportionment (SA) studies there is no standard procedure to select the most appropriate chemical components to be included in the input dataset for a given site typology, nor specific recommendations in this direction. However, these choices are crucial for the final SA outputs not only in terms of number of sources identified but also, and consequently, in the source contributions estimates. In fact, PMF tends to reproduce most of PM mass measured independently and introduced as a total variable in the input data, regardless of the percentage of PM mass which has been chemically characterized, so that the lack of some specific source tracers (e.g. levoglucosan) can potentially affect the results of the whole source apportionment study. The present study elaborates further on the same concept, evaluating quantitatively the impact of lacking specific sources' tracers on the whole source apportionment, both in terms of identified sources and source contributions. This work aims to provide first recommendations on the most suitable and critical components to be included in PMF analyses in order to reduce PMF output uncertainty as much as possible, and better represent the most commons PM sources observed in many sites in Western countries. To this aim, we performed three sensitivity analyses on three different datasets across EU, including extended sets of organic tracers, in order to cover different types of urban conditions (Mediterranean, Continental, and Alpine) , source types, and PM fractions. Our findings reveal that the vehicle exhaust source resulted to be less sensitive to the choice of analytes, although source contributions estimates can deviate significantly up to 44%. On the other hand, for the detection of the non-exhaust one is clearly necessary to analyze specific inorganic elements. The choice of not analysing non-polar organics likely causes the loss of separation of exhaust and non-exhaust factors, thus obtaining a unique road traffic source, which provokes a significant bias of total contribution. Levoglucosan was, in most cases, crucial to identify biomass burning contributions in Milan and in Barcelona, in spite of the presence of PAHs in Barcelona, while for the case of Grenoble, even discarding levoglucosan, the presence of PAHs allowed identifying the BB factor. Modifying the rest of analytes provoke a systematic underestimation of biomass burning source contributions. SIA factors resulted to be generally overestimated with respect to the base case analysis, also in the case that ions were not included in the PMF analysis. Trace elements were crucial to identify shipping emissions (V and Ni) and industrial sources (Pb, Ni, Br, Zn, Mn, Cd and As). When changing the rest of input variables, the uncertainty was narrow for shipping but large for industrial processes. Major and trace elements were also crucial to identify the mineral/soil factor at all cities. Biogenic SOA and Anthropogenic SOA factors were sensitive to the presence of their molecular tracers, since the availability of OC alone is unable to separate a SOA factor. Arabitol and sorbitol were crucial to detecting fungal spores while odd number of higher alkanes (C27 to C31) for plant debris.

A novel probabilistic source apportionment approach: Bayesian auto-correlated matrix factorization

The Application of Raman Spectroscopy Combined with Multivariable Analysis on Source Apportionment of Atmospheric Black Carbon Aerosols.

Combined Source Apportionment, Using Positive Matrix Factorization–chemical Mass Balance and Principal Component Analysis/multiple Linear Regression–chemical Mass Balance Models

Spatial source apportionment of airborne coarse particulate matter using PMF-Bayesian receptor model

Source apportionment of fine particulate matter at a megacity in China, using an improved regularization supervised PMF model

Bayesian mixtures of common factor analyzers: Model, variational inference, and applications

Towards a better understanding of fine PM sources: Online and offline datasets combination in a single PMF

Intra-urban Spatial Variability and Uncertainty Assessment of PM2.5 Sources Based on Carbonaceous Species.

Multimode process data modeling: A Dirichlet process mixture model based Bayesian robust factor analyzer approach

Short-term source apportionment of fine particulate matter with time-dependent profiles using SoFi Pro: exploring the reliability of rolling positive matrix factorization (PMF) applied to bihourly molecular and elemental tracer data

Comparison of Pm2.5 Source Apportionment Using Positive Matrix Factorization and Molecular Marker-Based Chemical Mass Balance

Combining Positive Matrix Factorization and Radiocarbon Measurements for Source Apportionment of PM 2.5 from a National Background Site in North China.

VOC source apportionment: How monitoring characteristics influence positive matrix factorization (PMF) solutions

Improved Source Apportionment of Organic Aerosols in Complex Urban Air Pollution Using the Multilinear Engine (ME-2)

Impact of Gas/Particle Partitioning of Semivolatile Organic Compounds on Source Apportionment with Positive Matrix Factorization

Aerosol source apportionment uncertainty linked to the choice of input chemical components

Improvements in source apportionment of multiple time-resolved PM2.5 inorganic and organic speciation measurements using constrained Positive Matrix Factorization

Positive Matrix Factorization of Ultrafine Particle Mass (PM0.1) at Three Sites in California

Comparative Receptor Models Using Principal Component Analysis/Absolute Principal Component Scores and Positive Matrix Factorization to Assess Source Apportionment of PM2.5-10 and PM2.5 in Urban Cities

Combination of Multiple Isotopes and PMF Model Provide Insights Into the Method Optimization of PM2.5 Source Apportionment During Haze Episodes

Positive Matrix Factorization of a 32-Month Series of Daily PM2.5 Speciation Data with Incorporation of Temperature Stratification.