Abstract:For a Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) aerosol source apportionment (SA) studies there is no standard procedure to select the most appropriate chemical components to be included in the input dataset for a given site typology, nor specific recommendations in this direction. However, these choices are crucial for the final SA outputs not only in terms of number of sources identified but also, and consequently, in the source contributions estimates. In fact, PMF tends to reproduce most of PM mass measured independently and introduced as a total variable in the input data, regardless of the percentage of PM mass which has been chemically characterized, so that the lack of some specific source tracers (e.g. levoglucosan) can potentially affect the results of the whole source apportionment study. The present study elaborates further on the same concept, evaluating quantitatively the impact of lacking specific sources' tracers on the whole source apportionment, both in terms of identified sources and source contributions. This work aims to provide first recommendations on the most suitable and critical components to be included in PMF analyses in order to reduce PMF output uncertainty as much as possible, and better represent the most commons PM sources observed in many sites in Western countries. To this aim, we performed three sensitivity analyses on three different datasets across EU, including extended sets of organic tracers, in order to cover different types of urban conditions (Mediterranean, Continental, and Alpine) , source types, and PM fractions. Our findings reveal that the vehicle exhaust source resulted to be less sensitive to the choice of analytes, although source contributions estimates can deviate significantly up to 44%. On the other hand, for the detection of the non-exhaust one is clearly necessary to analyze specific inorganic elements. The choice of not analysing non-polar organics likely causes the loss of separation of exhaust and non-exhaust factors, thus obtaining a unique road traffic source, which provokes a significant bias of total contribution. Levoglucosan was, in most cases, crucial to identify biomass burning contributions in Milan and in Barcelona, in spite of the presence of PAHs in Barcelona, while for the case of Grenoble, even discarding levoglucosan, the presence of PAHs allowed identifying the BB factor. Modifying the rest of analytes provoke a systematic underestimation of biomass burning source contributions. SIA factors resulted to be generally overestimated with respect to the base case analysis, also in the case that ions were not included in the PMF analysis. Trace elements were crucial to identify shipping emissions (V and Ni) and industrial sources (Pb, Ni, Br, Zn, Mn, Cd and As). When changing the rest of input variables, the uncertainty was narrow for shipping but large for industrial processes. Major and trace elements were also crucial to identify the mineral/soil factor at all cities. Biogenic SOA and Anthropogenic SOA factors were sensitive to the presence of their molecular tracers, since the availability of OC alone is unable to separate a SOA factor. Arabitol and sorbitol were crucial to detecting fungal spores while odd number of higher alkanes (C27 to C31) for plant debris.

Intra-urban Spatial Variability and Uncertainty Assessment of PM2.5 Sources Based on Carbonaceous Species.

Intra-urban spatial variability of PM 2.5 -bound carbonaceous components.

Sources, variability and parameterizations of intra-city factors obtained from dispersion-normalized multi-time resolution factor analyses of PM2.5 in an urban environment

Uncertainty Assessment of Source Attribution of PM(2.5) and Its Water-Soluble Organic Carbon Content Using Different Biomass Burning Tracers in Positive Matrix Factorization Analysis--a Case Study in Beijing, China.

Insight into PM<sub>2.5</sub> Sources by Applying Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) at an Urban and Rural Site of Beijing

Insight into PM 2.5 Sources by Applying Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) at an Urban and Rural Site of Beijing

Positive Matrix Factorization of a 32-Month Series of Daily PM2.5 Speciation Data with Incorporation of Temperature Stratification.

A Source Apportionment of U.S. Fine Particulate Matter Air Pollution

Insight into PM<sub>2.5</sub> sources by applying positive matrix factorization (PMF) at urban and rural sites of Beijing

Positive Matrix Factorization of Pm2.5: Comparison and Implications of Using Different Speciation Data Sets

Spatiotemporal Variations of Ambient PM10 Source Contributions in Beijing in 2004 Using Positive Matrix Factorization

Spatial source apportionment of airborne coarse particulate matter using PMF-Bayesian receptor model

PM2.5 Source Apportionment with Organic Markers in the Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization (SEARCH) Study

Positive Matrix Factorization of Ultrafine Particle Mass (PM0.1) at Three Sites in California

Quantification of Source Impact to Pm Using Three-Dimensional Weighted Factor Model Analysis on Multi-Site Data

Decomposing PM2.5 concentrations in urban environments into meaningful factors: 1. Separating the contribution of local anthropogenic activities from background and long-range transport

Seasonal variation and source apportionment of inorganic and organic components in PM2.5: influence of organic markers application on PMF source apportionment

Daily Mortality and PM2.5 Sources in Denver Estimated Using Only Particle-Phase or Total Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (Svocs)

Uncertainty Analysis in Source Apportionment of Heavy Metals in Road Dust Based on Positive Matrix Factorization Model and Geographic Information System.

Source-apportioned PM2.5 incorporating gas-phase partitioned semi-volatile organic compounds and hospitalizations in Denver

Aerosol source apportionment uncertainty linked to the choice of input chemical components