Abstract:Introduction: This single-center 2-arm parallel randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the dentoskeletal effects of bonded spurs combined with posterior build-ups vs conventional bonded spurs in the treatment of anterior open bite malocclusion in the mixed dentition. Methods: Patients aged from 7 to 11 years with anterior open bite, recruited at a university orthodontic clinic, were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The experimental group consisted of patients treated with bonded spurs combined with posterior build-ups. The comparison group comprised patients treated with conventional bonded spurs. Lateral headfilms were obtained at pretreatment and after 12 months of treatment. The primary outcome was the change in the overbite. Randomization was performed using the Web site www.randomization.com. Sequentially numbered opaque and sealed envelopes were used for allocation concealment. Blinding was applicable for outcome assessment only. Intergroup comparisons were performed using t or Mann-Whitney U tests (P <0.05). Mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained. Results: The experimental group included 24 patients (17 female, 7 male; mean age, 8.22 ± 1.06 years) and the comparison group comprised 25 patients (14 female, 11 male; mean age, 8.30 ± 0.99 years). Baseline demographic and cephalometric characteristics were similar between groups. After 12 months, all patients showed improvements. Both groups showed similar improvements of the overbite (MD, 0.00 mm; 95% CI, -0.92 to 0.91), similar slight decreases of the gonial (MD, 0.02°; 95% CI, -1.11 to 1.15) and mandibular plane (MD, 0.15°; 95% CI, -0.64 to 0.93) angles, and similar mandibular molar extrusion (MD, 0.14 mm; 95% CI, -0.27 to 0.56). The experimental group showed significantly smaller extrusion of the maxillary first molar than the comparison group (MD, -0.70 mm; 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.49). The other dentoskeletal variables showed similar changes without statistically significant intergroup differences. No serious harm was observed other than plaque accumulation around the spurs. Conclusions: Similar overbite increases and dentoskeletal changes were observed in both groups after 12 months of treatment. Although the experimental group showed significantly smaller extrusion of the maxillary molars, no greater counterclockwise rotation of the mandible than the comparison group was observed. Registration: This trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier NCT03702881). Protocol: The protocol was not published. Funding: This trial was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES), Finance Code 001; and by grants: no. 2017/06440-3, no. 2018/05238-9 and no. 2018/24003-2, São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP).

Surgical and Camouflage Orthodontic Treatment of Anterior Open Bite: Comparison of Profile Attractiveness

Nonsurgical treatment for an adult with open bite, narrow upper arch, and several impacted premolars

Long-term profile attractiveness of patients with Class I and II malocclusion treated with and without extractions: A 35-year follow-up

Dentoskeletal changes in open bite treatment using spurs and posterior build-ups: A randomized clinical trial

Perceived Effects of Orthognathic Surgery versus Orthodontic Camouflage Treatment of Convex Facial Profile Patients

An Analysis of Changes in the Dentofacial Skeleton Following Orthodontic Treatment in Anterior Open Bite Patients

Cephalometric evaluation of the anterior open bite treatment

Treatment acceptance in adult patients with anterior open bite: A National Dental Practice-Based Research Network study

Aesthetic Preference in the Transverse Orientation of the Occlusal Plane in Rehabilitation: Perspective of Laypeople and Dentists

Tratamento de mordida aberta com a técnica ortodôntica fixa sem bráquetes, com tecnologia tridimensional 3DBOT (bracketless orthodontics treatment)

Social, intellectual, psychological, and attractiveness judgements of lay people about patients before and after combined orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment

Ortho-surgical treatment in Class II skeletal patients with mandibular retrognathism: a concise systematic review

Evaluation of the Influence of Nasolabial Angle, Upper Sulcus Depth, and Nasal Tip Protrusion in the Perception of Facial Attractiveness

Nasal profile changes after orthodontic tooth extraction in Class II, Division 1 malocclusion patients: a retrospective study

An evaluation of cephalometric predictors of anterior open bite; An assessment of dental and skeletal parameters in an orthodontic population

Effect of Class II functional treatment on facial attractiveness, as perceived by professionals and laypeople

Perception of facial esthetics and cephalometric correlations in Class II patients: a comparison between two-phase and one-phase treatments

Evaluation of the open-bite Bionator versus the removable posterior bite plane with a tongue crib in the early treatment of skeletal anterior open bite: A randomized controlled trial

Impact of Orthodontic-Induced Facial Morphology Changes on Aesthetic Evaluation: a Retrospective Study

Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.

Outcome of orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients. A subjective and objective evaluation