The clinical evaluation of a widefield lens to expand the field of view in optical coherence tomography (OCT-A)

Fritz Soecknick,Katharina Breher,Zahra Nafar,Sophie Kubach,Jochen Straub,Siegfried Wahl,Focke Ziemssen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57405-3
IF: 4.6
2024-03-25
Scientific Reports
Abstract:This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of incorporating a widefield lens (WFL) in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) in patients with retinal vascular diseases in comparison to standard single-shot OCT-A scans. Sixty patients with retinal vascular diseases including diabetic retinopathy (DR) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) were recruited. OCT-A imaging (PlexElite 9000) with and without WFL was performed in randomized order. The assessment included patient comfort, time, field of view (FoV), image quality and pathology detection. Statistical analysis included paired t -tests, Mann–Whitney U -tests and Bonferroni correction for multiple tests, with inter-grader agreement using the kappa coefficient. Using a WFL did not lead to statistically significant differences in DR and RVO group test times. Patient comfort remained high, with similar responses for WFL and non-WFL measurements. The WFL notably expanded the scan field (1.6× FoV increase), enhancing peripheral retinal visibility. However, image quality varied due to pathology and eye dominance, affecting the detection of peripheral issues in RVO and DR cases. The use of a WFL widens the scan field, aiding vascular retinal disease imaging with minor effects on comfort, time, and image quality. Further enhancements are needed for broader view angles, enabling improved quantification of non-perfused areas and more reliable peripheral proliferation detection.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This study aims to evaluate the clinical benefits of using a wide - field lens (WFL) in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT - A) for patients with retinal vascular diseases. Specifically, the study compared the performance of using WFL and standard single - shot OCT - A scans in the following aspects: 1. **Patient comfort**: Evaluate the comfort level of patients when using WFL and not using WFL. 2. **Examination time**: Compare the examination time when using WFL and not using WFL. 3. **Field of view (FoV)**: Evaluate whether WFL can significantly expand the scanning field of view of OCT - A. 4. **Image quality**: Analyze the impact of WFL on image quality. 5. **Pathology detection**: Evaluate the ability of WFL to detect peripheral retinal lesions. ### Research background The diagnosis and monitoring of retinal vascular diseases are very important in ophthalmology. Although traditional OCT - A technology can provide high - resolution retinal vascular images, its scanning field of view is limited and usually only covers the central area. However, the lesions of many retinal vascular diseases (such as diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion) are not limited to the central area, and the lesions in the peripheral area are equally important. Therefore, expanding the scanning field of view of OCT - A is of great significance for a more comprehensive evaluation of these diseases. ### Research methods - **Research subjects**: The study recruited 60 patients with retinal vascular diseases, including diabetic retinopathy (DR) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO). - **Equipment**: The PlexElite 9000 OCT device was used for OCT - A imaging, and scans with and without WFL were performed in random order. - **Evaluation indicators**: - Patient comfort - Examination time - Scanning field of view range - Image quality - Pathology detection ability ### Main findings - **Field of view**: Using WFL significantly expanded the scanning field of view, with a 1.6 - fold increase in the field of view. - **Examination time**: Using WFL did not significantly prolong the examination time. - **Patient comfort**: Patients' comfort evaluations for WFL and non - WFL measurements were similar. - **Image quality**: Image quality varied depending on pathology and ocular dominance, affecting the detection of peripheral lesions. - **Pathology detection**: WFL is helpful for a more comprehensive evaluation of retinal vascular diseases, especially in detecting peripheral lesions. ### Conclusion Using WFL can significantly expand the scanning field of view of OCT - A, which is helpful for a more comprehensive evaluation of retinal vascular diseases, especially peripheral lesions. Although the impact of WFL on examination time and patient comfort is small, image quality may decline depending on pathology and ocular dominance. Future research needs to further improve WFL to achieve a wider field - of - view angle, so as to better quantify non - perfused areas and more reliably detect peripheral proliferative lesions.