Abstract:BACKGROUND. Dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with energy-integrating detector (EID) technology is limited by the inability to use high-pitch technique. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of anatomic images and iodine maps between high-pitch photon-counting detector (PCD) CTPA and dual-energy EID CTPA. METHODS. This prospective study included 117 patients (70 men and 47 women; median age, 65 years) who underwent CTPA to evaluate for pulmonary embolism between March 2022 and November 2022. Fifty-eight patients were randomized to undergo PCD CTPA (pitch, 2.0), and 59 were randomized to undergo EID CTPA (pitch, 0.55). For each examination, 120-kV polychromatic images, 60-keV virtual monogenetic images (VMIs), and iodine maps were reconstructed. One radiologist measured CNR and SNR. Three radiologists independently assessed subjective image quality (on a scale of 1-4, with a score of 1 denoting highest quality). Radiation dose was recorded. RESULTS. SNR and CNR were higher for PCD CTPA than for EID CTPA for polychromatic images and VMIs, for all assessed vessels other than the left upper lobe artery. For example, for PCD CTPA versus EID CTPA, the right lower lobe artery on polychromatic images had an SNR of 34.5 versus 28.0 (p = .003) and a CNR of 29.2 versus 24.4 (p = .001), and on VMIs it had an SNR of 43.2 versus 32.7 (p = .005) and a CNR of 37.4 versus 29.3 (p = .002). For both scanners for readers 1 and 2, the median image quality score for polychromatic images and VMIs was 1, although distributions indicated significantly better scores for PCD CTPA than for EID CTPA for polychromatic images for reader 1 (p = .02) and reader 2 (p = .005) and for VMIs for reader 1 (p = .001) and reader 2 (p = .006). The image quality of anatomic image sets was not different between PCD CTPA and EID CTPA for reader 3 (p > .05). The image quality of iodine maps was not different between PCD CTPA and EID CTPA for any reader (p > .05). For PCD CTPA versus EID CTPA, the CTDIvol was 3.9 versus 4.5 mGy (p = .03), and the DLP was 123.5 mGy × cm versus 157.0 mGy × cm (p < .001). CONCLUSION. High-pitch PCD CTPA provided anatomic images with better subjective and objective image quality versus dual-energy EID CTPA, with lower radiation dose. Iodine maps showed no significant difference in image quality between scanners. CLINICAL IMPACT. CTPA may benefit from the PCD CT technique.

A comparative study of image quality and diagnostic confidence in diagnosis and follow-up of scaphoid fractures using photon-counting detector CT and energy-integrating detector CT

Comparison of Bone Evaluation and Metal Artifact between Photon-Counting CT and Five Energy-Integrating-Detector CT under Standardized Conditions Using Cadaveric Forearms

Visualization of bone details in a novel photon-counting dual-source CT scanner—comparison with energy-integrating CT

Photon-Counting Detector CT for Musculoskeletal Imaging: A Clinical Perspective.

High-Resolution Head CTA: A Prospective Patient Study Comparing Image Quality of Photon-Counting Detector CT and Energy-Integrating Detector CT

The Feasibility of High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (HR-pQCT) in Patients with Suspected Scaphoid Fractures

Photon-Counting Computed Tomography (PC-CT) of the spine: impact on diagnostic confidence and radiation dose

Photon-counting in dual-contrast-enhanced computed tomography: a proof-of-concept quantitative biomechanical assessment of articular cartilage

Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT for visualization of the brachial plexus

Photon-Counting Detector CT Virtual Monoengergetic Images for Cochlear Implant Visualization—A Head to Head Comparison to Energy-Integrating Detector CT

Photon-counting detector CT – first experiences in the field of musculoskeletal radiology

Detection of myeloma-associated osteolytic bone lesions with energy-integrating and photon-counting detector CT

Full field-of-view, high-resolution, photon-counting detector CT: technical assessment and initial patient experience

Photon-Counting Detector CT Applications in Musculoskeletal Radiology

6-week radiographs unsuitable for diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures

Quantitative dual contrast photon-counting computed tomography for assessment of articular cartilage health

Quantitative metrics of bone quality determined at the distal radius using photon-counting CT

Photon-counting detector computed tomography for metal artifact reduction: a comparative study of different artifact reduction techniques in patients with orthopedic implants

Image Quality and Radiation Dose of CTPA With Iodine Maps: A Prospective Randomized Study of High-Pitch Mode Photon-Counting Detector CT Versus Energy-Integrating Detector CT

Photon-Counting Detector CT Angiography Versus Digital Subtraction Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease

Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Energy CT for Bone Stress Injury of the Lower Limb.