Abstract:Background The cocreation of eHealth solutions with potential users, or co-design, can help make the solution more acceptable. However, the co-design research approach requires substantial investment, and projects are not always fruitful. Researchers have provided guidelines for the co-design approach, but these are either applicable only in specific situations or not supported by empirical data. Ways to optimize the experience of the co-design process from the point of view of the participants are also missing. Scientific literature in the co-design field generally provides an extrinsic description of the experience of participants in co-design projects. Objective We addressed this issue by describing a co-design project and focusing on the participants’ experiences looking at what was significant from their point of view. Methods We used a qualitative situated cognitive anthropology approach for this study. Data were collected on a co-design research project that aimed to support the help-seeking process of caregivers of functionally dependent older adults. The methodology was based on the perspective of experience by Dewey and used the course-of-action theoretical and methodological framework. Data collection was conducted in 2 phases: observation of participants and recording of sessions and participant self-confrontation interviews using the session recordings. We interviewed 27% (20/74) of the participants. We analyzed the data through nonexclusive emerging categorization of themes using the constant comparative method. Results In total, 5 emerging themes were identified. The perception of extrinsic constraints and the effects of the situation was central and the most important theme, affecting other themes (frustrating interactions with others, learning together, destabilization, and getting personal benefits). Co-occurrences between codes allowed for a visual and narrative understanding of what was significant for the participants during this project. The results highlighted the importance of the role of the research team in preparing and moderating the sessions. They also provided a detailed description of the interactions between participants during the sessions, which is a core aspect of the co-design approach. There were positive and negative aspects of the participants’ experiences during this co-design project. Reflecting on our results, we provided potential affordances to shape the experience of participants in co-design. Conclusions Potential users are an essential component of the co-design research approach. Researchers and designers should seek to offer these users a positive and contributory experience to encourage participation in further co-design initiatives. Future research should explore how the proposed affordances influence the success of the intervention.

Viewpoints in co-design: a field study in concurrent engineering

There exist consistent temporal logics admitting changes of History

That was fun, now what?: Modelizing knowledge dynamics to explain co-design's shortcomings

Cross-Participants : fostering design-use mediation in an Open Source Software community

User Experience of the Co-design Research Approach in eHealth: Activity Analysis With the Course-of-Action Framework

Designing as Construction of Representations: A Dynamic Viewpoint in Cognitive Design Research

Designers in Teamworking

What Do I Need to Design for Co-Design? Supporting Co-design as a Designerly Practice

A leadership-as-practice perspective on design in architecture, engineering and construction projects: interaction analysis of a collaborative workshop

Exploring Communication in Collaborative Design: Co-Operative Architectural Modelling

Viewpoint, embodiment, and roles in STEM learning technologies

Design Ethics in Practice - Points of Departure

Boundary Objects in Design Studies: Reflections on the Collaborative Creation of Isochrone Maps

Information system based on a working situation model for a new design approach in concurrent engineering

User and stakeholder perspective taking in novice design teams

Dynamic aspects of individual design activities. A cognitive ergonomics viewpoint

Understanding complex viewpoints in smart sustainable cities: The experience of Suzhou, China

Framing Open Design through Theoretical Concepts and Practical Applications: A Systematic Literature Review

Quantitative dynamics of design thinking and creativity perspectives in company context

Analysis of the co-design activity: influence of a mixed artifact and contribution of the gestural function in a spatial augmented reality environment

DIMENSIONS OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY COLLABORATION: A COMPARATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW WITHIN DESIGN CONTEXT