Swift/BAT and RXTE Observations of the Peculiar X-ray Binary 4U 2206+54 - Disappearance of the 9.6 Day Modulation

R.H.D. Corbet,C.B. Markwardt,J. Tueller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/509319

2006-09-13

Abstract:Observations of the high-mass X-ray binary 4U 2206+54 with the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) do not show modulation at the previously reported period of 9.6 days found from observations made with the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) All-Sky Monitor (ASM). Instead, the strongest peak in the power spectrum of the BAT light curve occurs at a period of 19.25 +/- 0.08 days, twice the period found with the RXTE ASM. The maximum of the folded BAT light curve is also delayed compared to the maximum of the folded ASM light curve. The most recent ASM data folded on twice the 9.6 day period show similar morphology to the folded BAT light curve. This suggests that the apparent period doubling is a recent secular change rather than an energy-dependent effect. The 9.6 day period is thus not a permanent strong feature of the light curve. We suggest that the orbital period of 4U 2206+54 may be twice the previously proposed value.

Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the change in the periodic modulation characteristics of the high - mass X - ray binary system 4U 2206+54. Specifically, previous observations showed that the light - curve of this system had an obvious modulation phenomenon at a period of 9.6 days, but the latest Swift/BAT (Burst Alert Telescope) observation data showed that there was no significant modulation at this period, but the strongest modulation signal appeared at a period of 19.25±0.08 days. This indicates that the periodic behavior of 4U 2206+54 has changed.

### Summary of main problems:
1. **Change in periodic modulation**: Does the 9.6 - day periodic modulation phenomenon previously observed by RXTE (Rossi X - ray Timing Explorer) All - Sky Monitor (ASM) still exist?
2. **Determination of orbital period**: If the new 19.25 - day period is real, is the real orbital period of 4U 2206+54 19.25 days instead of the previous 9.6 days?
3. **Explanation of modulation mechanism**: Is this change in periodic modulation caused by orbital effects or super - orbital modulation? Is there an energy - dependent modulation phenomenon?

### Specific research contents:
- **Comparison of BAT and ASM observation results**: The paper compared the observation data of Swift/BAT and RXTE ASM and found that the BAT data showed that the most prominent modulation period was 19.25 days, not the previous 9.6 days.
- **Analysis of light - curves**: By performing a folding analysis on the BAT and ASM light - curves, it was found that there were differences in phase between the two, and the BAT data showed a single - peak modulation, while the ASM data showed a double - peak modulation.
- **Analysis of long - term changes**: By performing a subset analysis on the ASM data using the sliding - window method, it was found that the 9.6 - day period was stronger in the early ASM data, while the 19.25 - day period was stronger in the recent data, indicating that there may be long - term changes.

### Conclusions:
The paper proposes that the periodic modulation of 4U 2206+54 may have changed from 9.6 days to 19.25 days, implying that its orbital period may be 19.25 days instead of the previous 9.6 days. This change may be caused by changes in the internal structure or physical processes of the system, but further observations and theoretical explanations are still required to confirm it.

### Formula representation:
- New period: \[ P_{\text{new}} = 19.25\pm0.08 \, \text{days} \]
- Original period: \[ P_{\text{old}} = 9.6 \, \text{days} \]
- Phase difference: \[ \Delta\phi = 0.125\pm0.026 \]

These results are of great significance for understanding the evolution and physical mechanisms of high - mass X - ray binary systems.