T. Oosterbroek,J.H.J. de Bruijne,D. Martin,P. Verhoeve,M.A.C. Perryman,C. Erd,R. Schulz
Abstract:We have observed the Crab Pulsar in the optical with S-Cam, an instrument based on Superconducting Tunneling Junctions (STJs) with $\mu$s time resolution. Our aim was to study the delay between the radio and optical pulse. The Crab Pulsar was observed three times over a time span of almost 7 years, on two different locations, using three different versions of the instrument, and using two different GPS units. We consistently find that the optical peak leads the radio peak by 49$\pm$90, 254$\pm$170, and 291$\pm$100 $\mu$s. On assumption of a constant optical lead, the weighted-average value is $\sim$170 $\mu$s, or when rejecting (based on a perhaps questionable radio ephemeris) the first measurement, 273$\pm$100 $\mu$s.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to solve the problem of time delay in the light curves of the Crab Pulsar (PSR J0534+2200) at different wavelengths. Specifically, the authors observed the Crab Pulsar in the optical band by using the S - Cam instrument based on Superconducting Tunneling Junctions (STJs), and studied the time delay between the optical pulse and the radio pulse.
### Background of the paper
Accurately measuring the time of the pulsar light curve across the entire electromagnetic spectrum is a very powerful tool for constraining theories of the spatial distribution of various radiation regions. Recent studies have shown that there are differences in the time alignment of the main pulse and the secondary pulse of the Crab Pulsar at different wavelengths. For example, the X - ray pulse leads the radio pulse by about 344±40 μs, and the γ - ray pulse leads the radio pulse by about 241±29 μs. In the optical band, however, the observational results are more inconsistent, with different studies reporting time delays ranging from leading to lagging.
### Research purpose
The main goal of this paper is to accurately determine the pulse time delay of the Crab Pulsar in the optical band relative to the radio band through high - time - resolution optical observations, in order to resolve the inconsistencies in previous studies.
### Method
The authors used three different versions of the S - Cam instrument to conduct three observations at two different locations. Each observation used a different GPS unit to provide a time reference. The observational data were processed and converted into Barycentric Dynamical Time (TDB), and a folding analysis was carried out using the radio ephemeris of the Crab Pulsar.
### Results
The authors found that the optical pulse always leads the radio pulse, but the specific leading time varies in different observations. The specific values are as follows:
- S - Cam1 data: 49±90 μs
- S - Cam2 data: 254±170 μs
- S - Cam3 data: 291±100 μs
Assuming that the leading time of the optical pulse is constant, the weighted average is about 170 μs. If the first measurement (S - Cam1 data), which may be problematic, is excluded, the average leading time is 273±100 μs.
### Discussion and conclusion
The authors believe that the time delay of the optical pulse leading the radio pulse varies in different observations, which may be due to the uncertainty of the radio ephemeris. In particular, the large uncertainty in the S - Cam1 data may be due to the poor radio observation conditions at that time. Overall, the leading time of the optical pulse (273±65 μs) obtained by the authors is roughly consistent with the X - ray observation results (370±40 μs).
These results suggest that the optical radiation may be formed at a higher position in the magnetosphere than the radio radiation, or there is a certain angular difference between the optical and radio radiation beams. To further verify these conclusions, it is recommended to conduct simultaneous high - frequency radio and optical observations to reduce the uncertainty caused by interstellar scattering.