MTF Optimization in Digital Dental X-ray Systems

Eduardo Tavares Costa,Jorge Andre Girao Albuquerque

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0605242

2006-05-29

Abstract:In this work, we have studied the MTF optimisation relative to the detector aperture of four digital dental X-ray image systems: 1) Digora and Denoptix systems, based on PSPL detectors; 2) CDR and Sens-A-Ray 2000, based on CCD detectors. The MTF was evaluated by ERF method and linearized as a Gaussian process. The CCD based systems presented Gaussian characteristics. The PSPL based systems presented a composition of two Gaussian processes. We conclude that one process is due to the laser and stimulated light scattering inside the PSPL plate and the other is due to the laser beam focal aperture. Matching focal aperture to laser scattering allows the optimization of the PSPL systems resolution. An optimal pixel width found to be 62 um.

Instrumentation and Detectors,Medical Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to optimize the modulation transfer function (MTF) in digital dental X - ray systems, especially the optimization for detector apertures, in order to improve the resolution of the image system. Specifically, the research focuses on four digital dental X - ray imaging systems:

1. **Systems based on photostimulated luminescence (PSPL) detectors**:
- Digora (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland)
- Denoptix (Gendex Dental Systems srl, Milan, Italy)

2. **Systems based on charge - coupled device (CCD) detectors**:
- CDR (Schick Technologies Inc., New York, USA)
- Sens - A - Ray 2000 (Regam Medical System, Sudsvall, Sweden)

### Main problems and objectives

- **MTF optimization**: Improve the system's MTF by optimizing the match between the detector aperture and physical characteristics, thereby improving image resolution.
- **Analyze the MTF characteristics of different systems**: The research found that CCD systems exhibit Gaussian characteristics, while PSPL systems show a combination of two Gaussian processes.
- **Determine the optimal pixel width**: The research indicates that for PSPL systems, the optimal pixel width is 62 µm, which helps optimize the match between laser scattering and the laser beam focus aperture.

### Key formulas

The following formulas are used in the paper to describe the linearization process of MTF:

\[
\text{MTF}(\nu) = K e^{-\left(\frac{\nu}{\nu_0}\right)^2}
\]

where \(\nu\) is the spatial frequency, and \(K\) and \(\nu_0\) are constants.

The linearized MTF can be expressed as:

\[
\ln(\text{MTF}(\nu)) = a \nu + b
\]

where \(a=\frac{1}{2}K\), and \(b\) is a constant.

### Conclusions

Through the above research, the author concludes that the key to optimizing MTF lies in the rational design of detector apertures and pixel widths to match the physical characteristics of the system. Especially for PSPL systems, the optimal pixel width of 62 µm can significantly improve the system's resolution. In addition, CCD systems, due to their larger pixel sizes, exhibit higher resolution, but other limiting factors such as the influence of quantum noise still need to be considered.

In general, this research provides an effective method to separate and optimize different physical processes in digital X - ray imaging systems, thereby enhancing the overall performance of the system.