Recent progress in weak-coupling color superconductivity
A. Schmitt,D. Hou
2004-01-01
Abstract:We have calculated the polarization tensor Π ab (P ), a, b = 1, . . . , 8, γ, for gluons and photons in different colorsuperconducting phases. We have explicitly computed its zero-energy, low-momentum limit for the two-flavor color superconducting (2SC), color-flavor-locking (CFL), polar, and color-spin-locking (CSL) phases, which yield the Debye and Meissner masses. These masses determine the screening length of electric and magnetic fields. Parts of the results were already known in the literature, namely the gluon Debye and Meissner masses for the spin-0 phases 2SC and CFL [1, 2]. Our result for the photon Debye mass in the 2SC phase differs from that of Ref. [3] since our calculation shows that the photon-gluon mass matrix is already diagonal and thus electric gluons do not mix with the photon (while in Ref. [3] the same diagonal matrix was rotated and a “mixed mass” was obtained). The masses for the spin-1 phases have been computed here for the first time. For the polar phase, we have shown that there is mixing between the magnetic gauge bosons but, as in the 2SC phase, no mixing of the electric gauge bosons. In a system of one quark flavor, this mixing leads to a vanishing Meissner mass. However, for more than one quark flavor, we have shown that, if the electric charges of the quark flavors are not identical, there is an electromagnetic Meissner effect in the polar phase, contrary to both considered spin-0 phases. For the CSL phase, we have found the remarkable result that, for any number of flavors, neither electric nor magnetic gauge fields are mixed. Since there is no vanishing eigenvalue of Π ab (0), all eight gluons and the photon (electric as well as magnetic modes) become massive and there is an electromagnetic Meissner effect. For polar phase, although there is a masssless new photon for each flavor, the electromagnetic Meissner effect still exists for a color superconductor with three flavors of quarks because there is no unique mixing angle for the new photon. We argued that, in spite of a suppression of the gap of three orders of magnitude compared to the spin-0 gaps [5, 6], spin-1 gaps might be preferred in a charge-neutral system. The reason is that a mismatch of the Fermi surfaces of different quark flavors has no effect on the spin-1 phases, where quarks of the same flavor form Cooper pairs. Therefore we found that a compact stellar object with a core consisting of quark matter in a spin-one color-superconducting state is, with respect to its electromagnetic properties, different from an ordinary neutron star: a spin-one color superconductor is an electromagnetic superconductor of type I, while an ordinary neutron star is commonly believed to be of type II. We note that a type-I superconductor could provide one possible explanation for the observation of pulsars with precession periods of order 1 year [7].