Abstract:The purpose of computer assistance in a total knee replacement is to achieve optimal alignment, size, and positioning of the implant. The method is safe and accurate and may be particularly useful in cases with abnormal anatomy. Description: The classical computer-assisted system for total knee replacement was developed with real-time surgical navigation using infrared optical tracking arrays. The tracking arrays are attached to the tibial and femoral shafts, as well as to surgical tools, allowing the surgeon to move the tools relative to the knee. The computer-assisted systems allow the surgeon to combine the "measured resection" and "gap balancing" techniques.Step 1: Preoperative planning. Set up the computer and software with the manufacturer implant features and personal preferences.Step 2: Positioning and surgical exposure. Position the patient in order to optimize the camera view.Step 3: Fixation of marker pins. Fix the marker pins to the tibial and femoral shafts.Step 4: Registration of anatomical landmarks and mechanical axes. Move the limb and mark out the anatomical landmarks according to the instructions given by the computer.Step 5: Adaption to the best model. Continue to register the joint surface and anatomy to adapt the fittest pre-registered model to the knee.Step 6: Fine-tuning. The femoral and tibial components are adjusted in size, flexion, extension, rotation, slope, and positioning along the anterior-posterior axis.Step 7: Navigation of cutting blocks and ligament balancing. The cutting blocks are positioned with the assistance of computerized navigation, adjusting for the mechanical axis and ligament tension. The cuts are then performed. Implant trials are inserted, and remaining soft-tissue releases may be performed assisted by the computer. Final implantation is performed. Alternatives: Conventional knee replacement using intramedullary rods as guidance. Rationale: The alignment and positioning of the implant are improved with the use of computer navigation1-5. Abnormal anatomy, anatomical variants and deformities, and presence of previous fractures are easy to manage with the precise assistance from the computer. Thus, in many cases, computer assistance may be a useful tool. Expected outcomes: Computer-assisted navigation may optimize the precision and accuracy of the surgical procedure. Given the correct target, the outcome of total knee replacement may be more predictable with use of this tool; however, the impact on functional outcomes has not yet been proven to be clinically relevant in clinical trials, and the implant longevity has not been improved6-11. Important tips: Use two 3-mm drill pins for fixation of the optical array to the tibia and femur.If pins are placed within the wound (not through separate stab incisions), plan the positioning relative to the implant to avoid obstruction of the trials.In severely osteoporotic patients, use bicortical fixation and handle the tissues and limb gently to avoid bumping or displacing the optical array as this will negatively alter the registration and reduce navigational accuracy.Make sure the reflective beads on the optical array are clean at all times and remove them (if using clip-on beads) when using the saw to avoid blood splatter.Train an assistant to press the screen buttons in the correct order and in accordance with the surgical progress.

Computer-aided planning with exact implementation into surgical technique in TKA is as accurate as intraoperative navigation.

Conventional versus computer-navigated TKA: a prospective randomized study

Computerized Navigation: A Useful Tool in Total Knee Replacement

Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

[Comparison of Total Knee Arthroplasty with Computer Navigation Systems and Conventional Techniques].

Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up.

Progress in Computer‐Assisted Navigation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis with Extra‐Articular Deformity

Computer navigation and total knee arthroplasty.

Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Nonimage-Based Navigation System Versus Conventional Technique.

After 25 years of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty, where do we stand today?

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: an evidence-based evaluation.

The effect of computer assisted navigation on axial alignment of lower extremity in total knee replacement

Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?

[Short-term effectiveness of novel computer navigation system assisted total knee arthroplasty]

Computer-assisted navigation for the intraoperative assessment of lower limb alignment in high tibial osteotomy can avoid outliers compared with the conventional technique

[Application of remote sensing navigation system in total knee arthroplasty]

Computer Navigation Assisted Minimally Invasive Total Knee Replacement: Preliminary Report

Does computer navigation system really improve early clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

[Effect of the Surgical Time and Coronalmechanical Alignment after Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Computer Navigation System, Traditionalor 3D Printing Patient-Specific Instruments].

Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Computer Assisted Navigation in Patients with Severe Valgus Deformity of the Knee.

Computer-Assisted Knee Surgical Navigation