Abstract:Background The treatment planning process from segmentation to producing a deliverable plan is time‐consuming and labor‐intensive. Existing solutions automate the segmentation and planning processes individually. The feasibility of combining auto‐segmentation and auto‐planning for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for rectal cancers in an end‐to‐end process is not clear. Purpose To create and clinically evaluate a complete end‐to‐end process for auto‐segmentation and auto‐planning of VMAT for rectal cancer requiring only the gross tumor volume contour and a CT scan as inputs. Methods Patient scans and data were retrospectively selected from our institutional records for patients treated for malignant neoplasm of the rectum. We trained, validated, and tested deep learning auto‐segmentation models using nnU‐Net architecture for clinical target volume (CTV), bowel bag, large bowel, small bowel, total bowel, femurs, bladder, bone marrow, and female and male genitalia. For the CTV, we identified 174 patients with clinically drawn CTVs. We used data for 18 patients for all structures other than the CTV. The structures were contoured under the guidance of and reviewed by a gastrointestinal (GI) radiation oncologist. The predicted results for CTV in 35 patients and organs at risk (OAR) in six patients were scored by the GI radiation oncologist using a five‐point Likert scale. For auto‐planning, a RapidPlan knowledge‐based planning solution was modeled for VMAT delivery with a prescription of 25 Gy in five fractions. The model was trained and tested on 20 and 34 patients, respectively. The resulting plans were scored by two GI radiation oncologists using a five‐point Likert scale. Finally, the end‐to‐end pipeline was evaluated on 16 patients, and the resulting plans were scored by two GI radiation oncologists. Results In 31 of 35 patients, CTV contours were clinically acceptable without necessary modifications. The CTV achieved a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.85 (±0.05) and 95% Hausdorff distance of 15.25 (±5.59) mm. All OAR contours were clinically acceptable without edits, except for large and small bowel which were challenging to differentiate. However, contours for total, large, and small bowel were clinically acceptable. The two physicians accepted 100% and 91% of the auto‐plans. For the end‐to‐end pipeline, the two physicians accepted 88% and 62% of the auto‐plans. Conclusions This study demonstrated that the VMAT treatment planning technique for rectal cancer can be automated to generate clinically acceptable and safe plans with minimal human interventions.

Quantitative Evaluation of a Fully Automated Planning Solution for Prostate-Only and Whole-Pelvic Radiotherapy

Dosimetric Analysis of Radiation Treatment Plans Based on a Deep Learning Auto Contouring Model for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer

Automated plan generation for prostate radiotherapy patients using deep learning and scripted optimization

Automatic end‐to‐end VMAT treatment planning for rectal cancers

Plan Quality Analysis of Automated Treatment Planning Workflow with Commercial Auto-Segmentation Tools and Clinical Knowledge-Based Planning Models for Prostate Cancer.

Template-based automation of treatment planning in advanced radiotherapy: a comprehensive dosimetric and clinical evaluation

Fully automated radiotherapy treatment planning: A scan to plan challenge

Single Click Automated Breast Planning with Iterative Optimization

Validation of Fully Automated VMAT Plan Generation for Library-Based Plan-of-the-Day Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy

Automated treatment planning for whole breast irradiation with individualized tangential IMRT fields

MO‐A‐137‐05: Assessment and Prediction of Treatment Plan Quality Through Integrated Planning Script

Evaluation of a hybrid automatic planning solution for rectal cancer

Automatic Treatment Planning for Cervical Cancer Radiation Therapy Using Direct Three-Dimensional Patient Anatomy Match.

An Artificial Intelligence-Based Full-Process Solution for Radiotherapy: A Proof of Concept Study on Rectal Cancer

A patient-specific auto-planning method for MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy in prostate cancer

Automatic treatment planning for radiotherapy: a cross-modality and protocol study

A fully automated method for CT-on-rails-guided online adaptive planning for prostate cancer intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Clinical implementation and evaluation of deep learning-assisted automatic radiotherapy treatment planning for lung cancer

Automation of radiation treatment planning for rectal cancer

Autodelineation methods in a simulated fully automated proton therapy workflow for esophageal cancer

Deep-learning-driven Dose Prediction and Verification for Stereotactic Radiosurgical Treatment of Isolated Brain Metastases