Abstract:ABSTRACT Several epidemiological studies have provided evidence that long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (pm2.5) increases mortality rate. Furthermore, some population characteristics (e.g., age, race, and socioeconomic status) might play a crucial role in understanding vulnerability to air pollution. To inform policy, it is necessary to identify groups of the population that are more or less vulnerable to air pollution. In causal inference literature, the group average treatment effect (GATE) is a distinctive facet of the conditional average treatment effect. This widely employed metric serves to characterize the heterogeneity of a treatment effect based on some population characteristics. In this paper, we introduce a novel Confounder-Dependent Bayesian Mixture Model (CDBMM) to characterize causal effect heterogeneity. More specifically, our method leverages the flexibility of the dependent Dirichlet process to model the distribution of the potential outcomes conditionally to the covariates and the treatment levels, thus enabling us to: (i) identify heterogeneous and mutually exclusive population groups defined by similar GATEs in a data-driven way, and (ii) estimate and characterize the causal effects within each of the identified groups. Through simulations, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in uncovering key insights about treatment effects heterogeneity. We apply our method to claims data from Medicare enrollees in Texas. We found six mutually exclusive groups where the causal effects of pm2.5 on mortality rate are heterogeneous.

Identifying Brexit voting patterns in the British house of commons: an analysis based on Bayesian mixture models with flexible concomitant covariate effects

A mixture of experts model for rank data with applications in election studies

Dissent and Rebellion in the House of Commons: A Social Network Analysis of Brexit-Related Divisions in the 57$^{ th}$ Parliament

Rational voting behaviour accounting for heterogeneous ballots in British elections

Double Majority and Generalized Brexit: Explaining Counterintuitive Results

Who voted for a No Deal Brexit? A Composition Model of Great Britains 2019 European Parliamentary Elections

Explaining Differences in Voting Patterns Across Voting Domains Using Hierarchical Bayesian Models

Analysing vote-choice in a multinational state: national identity and territorial differentiation in the 2016 Brexit vote

Inferring Population Preferences via Mixtures of Spatial Voting Models

Bayesian analysis of Jolly-Seber type models; incorporating heterogeneity in arrival and departure

Assessing uncertainty of voter transitions estimated from aggregated data. Application to the 2017 French presidential election

Confounder-dependent Bayesian mixture model: Characterizing heterogeneity of causal effects in air pollution epidemiology

Improving and Validating Survey Estimates of Religious Demography Using Bayesian Multilevel Models and Poststratification

Joint modelling of dyadic and monadic count outcomes: an application to modelling forced migration flows

Bayesian shrinkage in mixture of experts models: Identifying robust determinants of class membership

Voter demographics and socio-economic factors in kinetic models for opinion formation

Mixtures of multivariate generalized linear models with overlapping clusters

Bayesian spatial voting model to characterize the legislative behavior of the Colombian Senate 2010-2014

Bayesian Analysis for Semiparametric Mixed-E®ects Double Regression Models

Multilevel multinomial logit regression model with random effects: application to flash EuroBarometer euro survey data

The Link Between Health Insurance Coverage and Citizenship Among Immigrants: Bayesian Unit-Level Regression Modeling of Categorical Survey Data Observed with Measurement Error