Predicting morphotropic phase boundary locations and transition temperatures in Pb- and Bi-based perovskite solid solutions from crystal chemical data and first-principles calculations

Ilya Grinberg,Matthew R. Suchomel,P.K. Davies,Andrew M. Rappe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2128049

2005-09-16

Abstract:Using data obtained from first-principles calculations, we show that the position of the morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) and transition temperature at MPB in ferroelectric perovskite solutions can be predicted with quantitative accuracy from the properties of the constituent cations. We find that the mole fraction of PbTiO$_3$ at MPB in Pb(B$'$B$''$)O$_3$-PbTiO$_3$, BiBO$_3$-PbTiO$_3$ and Bi(B$'$B$''$)O$_3$-PbTiO$_3$ exhibits a linear dependence on the ionic size (tolerance factor) and the ionic displacements of the B-cations as found by density functional theory calculations. This dependence is due to competition between the local repulsion and A-cation displacement alignment interactions. Inclusion of first-principles displacement data also allows accurate prediction of transiton temperatures at the MPB. The obtained structure-property correlations are used to predict morphotropic phase boundaries and transition temperatures in as yet unsynthesized solid solutions.

Materials Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to predict the position of the morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) and the transition temperature in ferroelectric perovskite solid solutions. Specifically, the authors hope to find a quantitatively accurate method to predict the composition ratio of the ferroelectric - antiferroelectric phase boundary and the corresponding transition temperature in perovskite solid solutions containing lead - based or bismuth - based materials through first - principles calculations and crystal - chemical data.

### Main problems

1. **Predicting the position of the morphotropic phase boundary**:
- Predict the molar fraction of PbTiO₃ at the morphotropic phase boundary by studying the properties of the constituent cations (such as ion size, displacement, etc.).
- Establish a quantitative relationship based on these properties to guide the design and synthesis of future materials.

2. **Predicting the transition temperature**:
- Study how to use the cation displacement data obtained from first - principles calculations to predict the transition temperature at the morphotropic phase boundary more accurately.
- Explain and improve the existing empirical rules (such as the relationship between the tolerance factor and the transition temperature) to improve the prediction accuracy.

### Background and motivation

Ferroelectric perovskite materials are of great value in piezoelectric and ferroelectric applications, especially in PbZr₁₋ₓTiₓO₃ (PZT) solid solutions, where the highest piezoelectric response occurs near the morphotropic phase boundary. However, finding better materials has always been a challenge because of the lack of effective guidance methods to predict the position of the morphotropic phase boundary and the transition temperature. This has led to a large amount of time and resources being required in the experimental synthesis process to determine the optimal composition.

### Methods and results

The authors used density - functional theory (DFT) calculations, combined with crystal - chemical data, to analyze the cation displacement in different perovskite solid solutions and its influence on the phase - boundary position and transition temperature. They found that:

- There is a linear relationship between the molar fraction of PbTiO₃ at the morphotropic phase boundary \( x_{\text{MPB}}^{\text{PT}} \) and the ion size (tolerance factor) and displacement of the B - site cations.
- By considering the off - center tendency of the B - site cations, the transition temperature at the morphotropic phase boundary can be predicted more accurately.

Finally, the authors proposed new formulas to predict the position of the morphotropic phase boundary and the transition temperature and verified the accuracy of these formulas. For example:

\[ x_{\text{MPB}}^{\text{PT}} = 1 - \frac{1}{0.34 + 3.31 R_{\text{avg}}^B - 7.49 D_{\text{avg}}^B} \]

for lead - only solid solutions, and

\[ x_{\text{MPB}}^{\text{PT}} = 1 - \frac{1}{- 0.97 + 5.71 R_{\text{avg}}^B - 7.69 D_{\text{avg}}^B} \]

for lead - and - bismuth - containing solid solutions.

These formulas provide a powerful tool for future material design and are helpful for developing ferroelectric and piezoelectric materials with better performance.