Abstract:Over the past few decades, a new form of governance has emerged to replace adversarial and managerial modes of policy making and implementation. Collaborative governance, as it has come to be known, brings public and private stakeholders together in collective forums with public agencies to engage in consensus-oriented decision making. In this article, we conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a contingency model of collaborative governance. After reviewing 137 cases of collaborative governance across a range of policy sectors, we identify critical variables that will influence whether or not this mode of governance will produce successful collaboration. These variables include the prior history of conflict or cooperation, the incentives for stakeholders to participate, power and resources imbalances, leadership, and institutional design. We also identify a series of factors that are crucial within the collaborative process itself. These factors include face-to-face dialogue, trust building, and the development of commitment and shared understanding. We found that a virtuous cycle of collaboration tends to develop when collaborative forums focus on ‘‘small wins’’ that deepen trust, commitment, and shared understanding. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of our contingency model for practitioners and for future research on collaborative governance. Over the last two decades, a new strategy of governing called ‘‘collaborative governance’’ has developed. This mode of governance brings multiple stakeholders together in common forums with public agencies to engage in consensus-oriented decision making. In this article, we conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a general model of collaborative governance. The ultimate goal is to develop a contingency approach to collaboration that can highlight conditions under which collaborative governance will be more or less effective as an

SHARED GOVERNANCE IN THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Community College Faculty Conceptualizations of Shared Governance: Shared Understandings of a Sociopolitical Reality

Tools in Their Toolbox: How Community College Faculty Transfer Industry Experience Into Their Teaching

Analysis on the Effectiveness of Faculty Senates in American Universities

The contemporary interpretation of Faculty Governance in the view of shared governance

Public Participation in Governance of Community College

Typology of State-level Community College Governance Structures

Community College Governance, Funding, and Accountability: A Century of Issues and Trends

Leading from the Inside Out: Learned Respect for Academic Culture through Shared Governance

Using shared governance to advance completion and transfer

A Study of Factors Relating to Student Participation in Community College Governance.

Commission on collegiate nursing education standards inspire a new model of shared governance

Structural Community Governance: Importance for Community‐Academic Research Partnerships

Shared Leadership in Higher Education

On Governmental Fiscal Support for Community Colleges in America

Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

Sources and information: Community college governance

Mutuality, Metaphor and Micropolitics in Collaborative Governance: a Joint Venture in UK Higher Education

Engaging Politically Disenfranchised Students in Governance

A Study on the Mechanisms of American Students’ Participation in University Governance