D. de Florian,G. A. Navarro,R. Sassot
Abstract:We investigate the sea quark polarization in the nucleon by means of a combined next to leading order analysis to the recently enlarged set of inclusive and semi-inclusive polarized deep inelastic scattering data. Using the Lagrange multiplier method, we asses the uncertainty inherent to the extraction of the different spin dependent parton densities in a QCD global fit, and the impact of the increased set of semi-inclusive data now available. We comment on future prospects at RHIC and JLAB and their potential impact in the future determination of polarized parton densities.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How to describe the evolution of a quantum system and assign probabilities to it without measurement?** Specifically, the author Seth Lloyd aims to extend and generalize the **decoherent histories theory**, making it applicable to a wider range of open - system operations and proposing experimentally verifiable decoherence criteria.
### Detailed Explanation:
1. **Background and Problem Definition**:
- Traditionally, the state of a quantum system can only be determined when it is measured. However, in many cases, we hope to be able to discuss the behavior of a quantum system without measurement devices and assign probabilities to different evolution paths.
- The **decoherent histories theory** provides a method for assigning classical probabilities to different evolution paths of a quantum system without measurement. This theory was initially proposed and developed by Griffiths, Omnes, Gell - Mann, Hartle and others.
2. **Main Contributions of the Paper**:
- **Generalizing the Decoherent Histories Theory**: The author generalizes the decoherent histories theory from projection operators to more general positive operator - valued measures (POVMs) and arbitrary open - system operations.
- **Proposing Experimentally Verifiable Decoherence Criteria**: The author proposes a measurement - based definition of decoherence, that is, if early measurements do not affect the probabilities of subsequent measurements, then these histories are decoherent. This definition has clear experimental significance and can be verified experimentally.
3. **Key Concepts and Formulas**:
- **Decoherence Functional**:
\[
D(i_1...i_n; i'_1...i'_n)=\text{tr}\left[P_n^{i_n}U...UP_1^{i_1}\rho P_1^{i'_1}U^\dagger...U^\dagger P_n^{i'_n}\right]
\]
where \(P_j^{i_j}\) are projection operators corresponding to different times \(t_j\), \(\rho\) is the initial density matrix of the system, and \(U\) is the unitary evolution operator of the system.
- **Decoherence Condition**:
\[
\text{Re}\left[D(i_1...i_n; i'_1...i'_n)\right]\propto\delta_{i_1 i'_1}...\delta_{i_n i'_n}
\]
When the above condition is satisfied, the history is considered to be weakly decoherent.
4. **Applications and Examples**:
- The paper illustrates how to apply these theories through specific examples, such as Gaussian quasi - projections of continuous systems and spin - direction projection measurements of spin - 1/2 particles.
- It also discusses the applications of these theories in quantum computing, especially the question of whether NMR quantum computing depends on quantum coherence.
### Summary:
This paper, by generalizing the decoherent histories theory, provides a framework that enables the description of the evolution of a quantum system and the assignment of probabilities to different evolution paths without measurement. In addition, the author proposes an experimentally verifiable decoherence criterion, further enhancing the practicality and testability of this theory.