K. Razi Naqvi
Abstract:Ornstein and his coauthors, who constructed a dynamical theory of Brownian motion, taking the equation $mdv/dt =-\zeta v+X$ as their starting point, usually named the equation after Einstein alone or after both Einstein and Langevin; furthermore, Ornstein, who was the first to extract from this equation the correct expression for $\bar{\Delta^2}$, the mean-squared distance covered by a Brownian particle, credited de Haas-Lorentz, rather than Langevin, for finding the stationary limit of $\bar{\Delta^2}$. A glance at Einstein's 1907 paper, titled ``Theoretical remarks on Brownian motion'', should suffice to convince one that it is not unfair to attribute the {\it conception} of the above equation, now universally known as the Langevin equation, to Einstein. Langevin's avowed aim in his 1908 article was to recover, through a route that was `infinitely more simple', Einstein's 1905 expression for the diffusion coefficient, but a careful reading of Langevin's paper shows that--depending on how one interprets his description of the statistical behavior of the random force $X$ appearing in the above equation--his analysis is at best incomplete, and at worst a mere tautology. Since textbook accounts are based on the interpretation that renders the proof fallacious, alternative derivations, which are adaptations of those given by de Haas-Lorentz and Ornstein, are presented here. Some neglected aspects of the contents of Ornstein's early papers on Brownian motion are also brought to light.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to the origin of the Langevin equation and some misunderstandings and inaccuracies when calculating the mean squared displacement (MSD) of Brownian motion particles. Specifically, the author K. Razi Naqvi points out the following issues:
1. **The attribution problem of the Langevin equation**:
- The Langevin equation is usually attributed to Langevin, but in fact, Einstein had already proposed a similar concept in his 1907 paper. Ornstein et al. also often attributed this equation to Einstein or to both Einstein and Langevin in their research.
2. **Logical flaws in Langevin's derivation**:
- In his 1908 paper, Langevin proposed a simplified derivation method to calculate the mean squared displacement. However, this derivation relies on an unproven assumption that the average value of the product of the random force \(X\) and the position \(x\) is zero (\(\langle xX \rangle = 0\)). This assumption is not obviously valid in physics and can lead to some contradictory results.
3. **Understanding of the statistical properties of the Langevin equation**:
- The paper points out that many subsequent researchers and textbooks, when citing Langevin's derivation, have ignored its potential problems, leading to some misleading conclusions. For example, if we assume \(\langle vX \rangle = 0\) and \(\langle xv \rangle = 0\), results that do not conform to the actual situation will be obtained.
4. **Providing a more rigorous derivation**:
- The author proposes an alternative derivation method based on the work of Ornstein et al. Although this method is not as concise as Langevin's method, it is more rigorous and can better explain the physical phenomena in Brownian motion.
In summary, the main purpose of this paper is to correct the logical errors in Langevin's derivation and emphasize that more rigorous and accurate derivation methods should be adopted in teaching and research. By re - examining historical literature and the contributions of early researchers, the author hopes to provide a more solid foundation for the theory of Brownian motion.
### Formula Arrangement
- **Langevin Equation**:
\[
m \frac{dv}{dt}=-\zeta v + X
\]
where \(m\) is the particle mass, \(\zeta\) is the friction coefficient, \(v\) is the velocity, and \(X\) is the random force.
- **Expression for Mean Squared Displacement**:
\[
\Delta^2=\frac{RT}{6\pi \mu a N}
\]
where \(R\) is the gas constant, \(T\) is the temperature, \(\mu\) is the liquid viscosity, \(a\) is the particle radius, and \(N\) is Avogadro's constant.
- **The Key Equation after Modification**:
\[
m \frac{dz}{dt}+ 3\pi \mu az=\frac{RT}{N}+\langle xX \rangle
\]
where \(z = \frac{dx^2}{dt}\).
- **Statistical Properties of Random Acceleration**:
\[
A(t)A(t_1)=
\begin{cases}
0 & \text{if } t_1\neq t \\
\infty & \text{if } t_1 = t
\end{cases}
\]
\[
\int_0^t A(t)A(t_1)dt_1=\alpha \beta
\]
Through these formulas, the author shows how to correctly handle the correlation between the random force and the position, thus avoiding the logical loopholes in Langevin's original derivation.