Topological Quantum Computation and Error Correction by Biological Cells

J T Lofthouse

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0502011

2005-02-03

Abstract:A Topological examination of phospholipid dynamics in the Far from Equilibrium state has demonstrated that metabolically active cells use waste heat to generate spatially patterned membrane flows by forced convection and shear. This paper explains the resemblance between this nonlinear membrane model and Witten Kitaev type Topological Quantum Computation systems, and demonstrates how this self-organising membrane enables biological cells to circumvent the decoherence problem, perform error correction procedures, and produce classical level output as shielded current flow through cytoskeletal protein conduit. Cellular outputs are shown to be Turing compatible as they are determined by computable in principle hydromagnetic fluid flows, and importantly, are Adaptive from an Evolutionary perspective.

General Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the paper attempts to solve

This paper aims to determine the **barrier height** and **prefactor** of protein folding from experimentally measured protein - folding rate data by applying the Kramers rate theory. Specifically, the author attempts to solve the following problems:

1. **How to combine experimental data and theoretical models to derive key parameters in the protein - folding process?**
- The author utilized the Kramers rate theory and combined with experimentally measured folding - rate data to propose a method for determining the energy - barrier height and prefactor involved in the protein - folding process.

2. **How to explain the effects of temperature and denaturant concentration in protein - folding kinetics?**
- The author explored the effects of temperature and denaturant concentration on the protein - folding rate and explained these effects through a theoretical model.

3. **What are the differences in prefactors and barrier heights under different models?**
- The author examined three different prefactor models: the random - energy approximation, the correlated - energy approximation, and the single Arrhenius activation - energy approximation. There are significant differences in the barrier heights and prefactors obtained under each model.

4. **Why do some models fail to provide effective solutions?**
- In particular, for the Arrhenius model, the author found that it usually fails to provide effective solutions, indicating that this model may not be suitable for describing the protein - folding process.

5. **How to evaluate the accuracy and applicable range of theoretical models?**
- The author verified the effectiveness and limitations of different models by analyzing the data of multiple proteins and discussed the applicability of theoretical models under specific conditions.

### Key formulas

- **Kramers rate equation**:
\[
\ln k_F(T, c)=\ln k_o(T, c)-\frac{\Delta G_U^\ddagger(T, c)}{T}
\]
where \( k_F \) is the folding rate, \( k_o \) is the prefactor, and \( \Delta G_U^\ddagger \) is the activation free energy of the unfolded state.

- **Barrier height change**:
\[
\delta \Delta G_U^\ddagger =-\left(\frac{m_U^\ddagger}{m}\right)\delta \Delta G
\]
where \( m_U^\ddagger \) and \( m \) are the slope of the unfolded state and the total slope respectively, and \( \delta \Delta G \) is the stability change.

- **Prefactor in the Arrhenius model**:
\[
\ln k_o(T)=\ln k_{oo}-\frac{E_A}{T}
\]
where \( E_A \) is the activation energy.

Through the answers to these questions, the author hopes to gain a deeper understanding of the kinetic mechanisms of protein folding and provide a theoretical basis and experimental guidance for future research.