Abstract:This Perspective is intended to raise questions about the conventional interpretation of protein folding. According to the conventional interpretation, developed over many decades, a protein population can visit a vast number of conformations under unfolding conditions, but a single dominant native population emerges under folding conditions. Accordingly, folding comes with a substantial loss of conformational entropy. How is this price paid? The conventional answer is that favorable interactions between and among the side chains can compensate for entropy loss, and moreover, these interactions are responsible for the structural particulars of the native conformation.Challenging this interpretation, the Perspective introduces a proposal that high energy (i.e., unfavorable) excluding interactions winnow the accessible population substantially under physical‐chemical conditions that favor folding. Both steric clash and unsatisfied hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are classified as excluding interactions, so called because conformers with such disfavored interactions will be largely excluded from the thermodynamic population. Both excluding interactions and solvent factors that induce compactness are somewhat non‐specific, yet together they promote substantial chain organization.Moreover, proteins are built on a backbone scaffold consisting of α‐helices and strands of β‐sheet, where the number of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors is exactly balanced. These repetitive secondary structural elements are the only two conformers that can be both completely hydrogen‐bond satisfied and extended indefinitely without encountering a steric clash. Consequently, the number of fundamental folds is limited to no more than ~10,000 for a protein domain. Once excluding interactions are taken into account, the issue of "frustration" is largely eliminated and the Levinthal paradox is resolved.Putting the "bottom line" at the top: it is likely that hydrogen‐bond satisfaction represents a largely under‐appreciated parameter in protein folding models.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Entropic Barriers, Frustration and Order: Basic Ingredients in Protein Folding

Effect of Secondary Structure on the Conformations and Folding Behaviors of Protein-Like Chains

Solvation and Desolvation Effects in Protein Folding: Native Flexibility, Kinetic Cooperativity and Enthalpic Barriers under Isostability Conditions

Thermodynamic control and dynamical regimes in protein folding

Simple Models of the Protein Folding Problem

Protein folding ‐ seeing is deceiving

Protein folding tames chaos

Frustration, function and folding

Folding Rate Optimization Promotes Frustrated Interactions in Entangled Protein Structures

Chevron Behavior and Isostable Enthalpic Barriers in Protein Folding: Successes and Limitations of Simple Gō-like Modeling.

Protein Folding: From Classical Issues to a New Perspective

Folding Kinetics of Protein Like Heteropolymers

Making sense of chaos: uncovering the mechanisms of conformational entropy

The Folding Transition State of Protein L is Extensive with Nonnative Interactions (and Not Small and Polarized)

Protein Folding: A Perspective From Statistical Physics

Statics, metastable states and barriers in protein folding: A replica variational approach

Theoretical Perspectives on Protein Folding

Cooperativity, Local-Nonlocal Coupling, and Nonnative Interactions: Principles of Protein Folding from Coarse-Grained Models

Designability, Thermodynamic Stability, And Dynamics In Protein Folding: A Lattice Model Study

The Multiphase Halo of NGC 891: WIYN H-alpha and BVI Imaging

Exploring the mechanisms of protein folding