Abstract:Over the past three decades, the U.S. judiciary has grown increasingly less receptive to claims by convicted felons as to the conditions of their confinement while in prison. Although courts have not articulated a return to the "hands off" policy of the 1950s, it is clear that it has become significantly more difficult for prisoners to prevail in constitutional correctional litigation. The passage and aggressive implementation of the Prison Litigation Reform Act has been a powerful disincentive to such litigation in many areas of prisoners' rights law. From the perspective of the prisoner, the legal landscape is more hopeful in matters that relate to mental health care and treatment. Here, in spite of a general trend toward more stringent applications of standards of proof and a reluctance to order sweeping, intrusive remedies, some courts have aggressively protected prisoners' rights to be free from "deliberate indifference" to serious medical needs, and to be free from excessive force on the part of prison officials. A mostly hidden undercurrent in some prisoners' rights litigation has been the effort on the part of some plaintiffs' lawyers to look to international human rights doctrines as a potential source of rights, an effort that has met with some modest success. It receives support by the inclination of other courts to turn to international human rights conventions-even in nations where such conventions have not been ratified-as a kind of "best practice" in the area. The recent publication and subsequent ratification (though not, as of yet, by the United States) of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) may add new support to those using international human rights documents as a basis for litigating prisoners' rights claims. To the best of our knowledge, there has, as of yet, been no scholarly literature on the question of the implications of the CRPD on the state of prisoners' rights law in a U.S. domestic context. In this article, we raise this question, and offer some tentative conclusions.

Naming and shaming in UN treaty bodies: Individual petitions' effect on human rights

The Effects of Naming and Shaming on Public Support for Compliance with International Agreements: An Experimental Analysis of the Paris Agreement

Reconsidering the costs of commitment: Learning and state acceptance of the UN human rights treaties' individual complaint procedures

Catching flies with vinegar or honey? Shaming, praising, and public support for international agreements

The power of human rights tribunals: Compliance with the European Court of Human Rights and domestic policy change

Review of 'Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics' by Beth A. Simmons

"It's doom alone that counts": can international human rights law be an effective source of rights in correctional conditions litigation?

A fox in the henhouse: China, normative change, and the UN Human Rights Council

Rulers or Rules? International Law, Elite Cues and Public Opinion

Seeking overlap and redundancy in human rights protection: reputation, consistency and the acceptance of the UN human rights treaties’ individual communications procedures

On the Normative Structure of International Human Rights Treaties Monitoring Mechanisms and Its Legal Challenges

Everyday Lawmaking in International Human Rights Law: Insights from the Inclusion of Domestic Violence in the Prohibition of Torture

How Organizational Policies Influence Bystander Likelihood of Reporting Moderate and Severe Sexual Harassment at Work

The Humanitarian Initiative: A Critical Appreciation

The Domestic Politics of International Human Rights Law: Implementing the Convention on the Rights of the Child in Ecuador, Chile, and Argentina

Strengthening the Human Rights Treaty Body System Today: Achievements and Challenges

International Human Rights Law: Enforcement Mechanisms and Challenges in a Globalized World

Enforcers beyond Borders: Transnational NGOs and the Enforcement of International Law

International treaties have mostly failed to produce their intended effects

Empowering to constrain: Procedural checks in international organizations

Noncompliance and punishment: lessons from multilateral chemical, biological, and nuclear arms control