Probing a neural unreliability account of auditory sensory processing atypicalities in Rett Syndrome

Tufikameni Brima,Shlomit Beker,Kevin D. Prinsloo,John S. Butler,Aleksandra Djukic,Edward G. Freedman,Sophie Molholm,John J. Foxe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-024-09544-x
2024-06-05
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Abstract:In the search for objective tools to quantify neural function in Rett Syndrome (RTT), which are crucial in the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy in clinical trials, recordings of sensory-perceptual functioning using event-related potential (ERP) approaches have emerged as potentially powerful tools. Considerable work points to highly anomalous auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) in RTT. However, an assumption of the typical signal-averaging method used to derive these measures is "stationarity" of the underlying responses – i.e. neural responses to each input are highly stereotyped. An alternate possibility is that responses to repeated stimuli are highly variable in RTT. If so, this will significantly impact the validity of assumptions about underlying neural dysfunction, and likely lead to overestimation of underlying neuropathology. To assess this possibility, analyses at the single-trial level assessing signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), inter-trial variability (ITV) and inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC) are necessary.
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?