Identification, Quantification, and Imaging of the Biodistribution of Soot Particles by Mass Spectral Fingerprinting

Yue Lin,Xiu Huang,Yongchun Liu,Dong Cao,Dawei Lu,Zeming Feng,Qian Liu,Zhenyu Lin,Guibin Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c05180
IF: 7.4
2021-04-21
Analytical Chemistry
Abstract:Soot is ubiquitous and has large detrimental effects on climate, air quality, and human health. However, identification of soot in carbonaceous media is very challenging due to its nanoscale carbon nature and complex sources. Due to the shortage in the methodology, until now, the fate and health effect of soot particles after inhalation are still poorly understood. Here, we report a new method for label-free identification, quantification, and imaging of soot particles in complex media based on laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry fingerprinting. We found that soot particles from different origins and with different morphologies showed highly consistent mass spectral fingerprints deriving from peak ratios of small carbon cluster anions (C<sub>2</sub><sup>–</sup>–C<sub>10</sub><sup>–</sup>), which enabled both accurate quantification of soot in fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) samples and label-free imaging of soot particles in biological media. By using this technique, we tracked and imaged the suborgan distribution of soot particles in mice after exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub>. The results showed that the lung is the main target organ for short-term inhalation exposure to soot particles. This study helps to better understand the inhalation toxicology of soot and also provides a practical novel methodological platform for identification, tracing, and toxicological studies of elemental carbon-based nanomaterials.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c05180?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c05180</a>.Subtle difference in the MS fingerprints of soot from different sources; optimization of experimental conditions; sample pretreatment procedures of environmental samples for soot analysis by LDI-MS; isotopic peaks of C<sub><i>n</i></sub><sup>-</sup> fingerprint peaks in PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples; LDI-MS fingerprints of PAHs; LDI-MS fingerprints of other typical OCs; determination of soot in PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples; effect of sample pretreatment and organic compounds on the soot determination; the linear relationship between the average peak intensity at <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 72.0 and the soot concentration in the matrix of mice lung under different conditions; enlarged LDI IMS images of soot; LDI-MS images of mouse tissue sections at fingerprint peaks; ratios of fingerprint peak intensity (<i>Iy</i>/<i>Ix</i>) of soot extracted from PM<sub>2.5</sub> in LDI-TOF MS; RSDs for the ratios of fingerprint peak intensity (<i>Iy</i>/<i>Ix</i>) of soot extracted from PM<sub>2.5</sub> in LDI-TOF MS; ratios of fingerprint peak intensity (<i>Iy</i>/<i>Ix</i>) of soot extracted from vehicle exhaust in LDI-TOF MS; RSDs for the ratios of fingerprint peak intensity (<i>Iy</i>/<i>Ix</i>) of soot from vehicle exhaust; ratios of fingerprint peak intensity (<i>Iy</i>/<i>Ix</i>) of soot extracted from smokestacks in LDI-TOF MS; RSDs for the ratios of fingerprint peak intensity (<i>Iy</i>/<i>Ix</i>) of soot from smokestacks; ratios of fingerprint peak intensity (<i>Iy</i>/<i>Ix</i>) of soot extracted from bunker coal in LDI-TOF MS; RSDs for the ratios of fingerprint peak intensity (<i>Iy</i>/<i>Ix</i>) of soot from bunker coal; ratios of fingerprint peak intensity (<i>Iy</i>/<i>Ix</i>) of soot extracted from food colouring in LDI-TOF MS; RSDs for the ratios of fingerprint peak intensity (<i>Iy</i>/<i>Ix</i>) of soot from food colouring; ratios of fingerprint peak intensity (<i>Iy</i>/<i>Ix</i>) in engineered carbon black by LDI-TOF MS; RSDs for the ratios of fingerprint peak intensity (<i>Iy</i>/<i>Ix</i>) of soot from engineered carbon black; comparison of analytical results of soot by using the present method and the 29 conventional thermal-optical method; determination of soot in PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples collected in Beijing; and comparison of dried-droplet method and section method in the determination 36 of soot in the lung of PM<sub>2.5</sub>-exposed mice(<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c05180/suppl_file/ac0c05180_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
chemistry, analytical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper mainly addresses the following issues: 1. **Development of a new method**: The paper proposes a new method based on Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry (LDI-MS) fingerprinting for label-free identification, quantitative analysis, and imaging of carbon black particles (i.e., "soot") in complex media. 2. **Solving the identification challenge**: Due to the nano-scale carbon nature and complex sources of soot, its identification in carbon-containing media is very challenging. This study successfully achieves accurate identification of soot by detecting the peak ratios of specific small carbon cluster anions (C2- to C10-). 3. **Quantification and imaging**: This method not only enables accurate quantification of soot in atmospheric fine particulate matter (PM2.5) samples but also allows for label-free imaging of soot particles in biological media. 4. **Application example**: The paper demonstrates how this technology can be used to track and image the distribution of soot particles in mice exposed to PM2.5. The results show that the lungs are the primary target organ for inhaled soot in the short term. In summary, the key issue addressed by this paper is providing an effective method to identify, quantify, and track soot particles in complex environments (especially within biological systems), which is crucial for understanding the toxicological effects of soot particles and their impact on health.