Abstract:Scoring rules are commonly applied to assess the accuracy of density forecasts in both univariate and multivariate settings. In a financial risk management context, we are mostly interested in a particular region of the density: the (left) tail of a portfolio's return distribution. The dependence structure between returns on different assets (associated with a given portfolio) is usually time-varying and asymmetric. In this paper, we conduct a simulation study to compare the discrimination ability between the well-established scores and their threshold-weighted versions with selected regions. This facilitates a comprehensive comparison of the performance of scoring rules in different settings. Our empirical applications also confirm the importance of weighted-threshold scores for accurate estimates of Value-at-risk and related measures of downside risk.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the performance of different weighted multivariate scoring rules in assessing the accuracy of density forecasts in the context of financial risk management, especially when focusing on specific regions (such as the left - tail of the portfolio return distribution) and the dependence structure between different assets. Specifically, the author compares the discriminatory power between traditional scoring rules and their threshold - weighted versions through simulation studies and empirical analysis. This helps to estimate the value - at - risk (VaR) and other downside - risk measures more accurately. ### Summary of the Core Problems in the Paper: 1. **Density Forecast Evaluation**: How to more accurately evaluate the accuracy of multivariate density forecasts in financial risk management. 2. **Attention to Specific Regions**: Pay special attention to the left - tail part of the portfolio return distribution, because this part is particularly important for risk management. 3. **Dependence Structure**: Considering that the dependence relationships between different assets are usually time - varying and asymmetric, how to reflect this in the evaluation. 4. **Application of Weighted Scoring Rules**: Introduce weighted scoring rules to better capture the information in specific regions and verify their performance in different situations. ### Main Contributions: - The effectiveness of prediction accuracy tests based on weighted scoring rules is studied through Monte Carlo simulations. - Empirical analysis shows that the dynamically selected density performs excellently in VaR estimation, confirming that the relative performance of the prediction density is time - varying and asymmetric. ### Methodology: - Use scoring rules such as the weighted energy score and the weighted variogram score. - Consider different Copula structures (such as Gaussian Copula, t - Copula, Gumbel Copula, etc.) in the simulation study to evaluate the influence of different dependence structures. - In the empirical application, use GARCH - type models (such as GAS model, DCC - GARCH model and GARCH Copula model) to model and predict the daily log - returns of the FTSE 100 and S&P 500 indices. ### Conclusions: - The weighted variogram score rule has significantly better discriminatory power than the weighted energy score rule in all scenarios. - When the threshold is appropriately selected, the weighted variogram score rule shows superior discriminatory power in specific tail regions. - Empirical results show that the dynamically selected density performs better in VaR estimation, further confirming that the relative performance of the prediction density is time - varying and asymmetric. Through these studies, the author provides a more precise and effective method for density forecast evaluation in financial risk management.

Evaluating Density Forecasts Using Weighted Multivariate Scores in a Risk Management Context

Optimal Capital Allocation Based on Weighted-Mean-Variance Principle

Evaluating the Discrimination Ability of Proper Multivariate Scoring Rules

Scores for Multivariate Distributions and Level Sets

Evaluating the Default Risk of Bond Portfolios with Extreme Value Theory

Static and Dynamic Models for Multivariate Distribution Forecasts: Proper Scoring Rule Tests of Factor-Quantile vs. Multivariate GARCH Models

Regions of Reliability in the Evaluation of Multivariate Probabilistic Forecasts

Weighted scoringRules: Emphasising Particular Outcomes when Evaluating Probabilistic Forecasts

Scoring rule nets: beyond mean target prediction in multivariate regression

Score-driven Exponentially Weighted Moving Averages and Value-at-Risk Forecasting

Optimal probabilistic forecasts for risk management

Beyond Strictly Proper Scoring Rules: The Importance of Being Local

Locally tail-scale invariant scoring rules for evaluation of extreme value forecasts

Local scale invariance and robustness of proper scoring rules

Proper Scoring Rules for Multivariate Probabilistic Forecasts based on Aggregation and Transformation

Forecasting Time-varying Value--at--Risk and Expected Shortfall Dependence: A Markov-switching Generalized Autoregressive Score Copula Approach

Evaluation of binary classifiers for asymptotically dependent and independent extremes

A Proper Scoring Rule for Validation of Competing Risks Models

Scaling and measurement error sensitivity of scoring rules for distribution forecasts

A hybrid nonparametric multivariate density estimator with applications to risk management

Dynamic spatiotemporal correlation coefficient based on adaptive weight